I think the mistake many make when we discuss topics of this nature is, they make blanket statements of certain calibers "being good or bad" for home defense or other purposes, without considering all the different and many variables that can go into that topic. For instance,
First guy says, ".556 is great for home defense." Now this guy, is probably thinking, a lightweight, high velocity hollow point or frangible bullet, that is specifically designed for home defense. The only problem is, he didn't state any of these variables in his statement.
Second guy comes along and see's this; and says, "No, it's not good for home defense, I have seen a .556 go thru a 2x8 wooden beam easily!" Now, he is making the exact same mistake the first guy is, because he failed to articulate, the bullet he saw go thru that 2x8 beam, was an SS109 armor piercing bullet, or some other, slower velocity 76 grain slug with a solid copper jacket and hardened core, that is specifically designed to penetrate thru barriers.
Both guys are absolutely correct in their statements, but both are absolutely disagreeing with the others true statements, because they have failed to articulate or consider, all the intangible variables of that exact same round.
So, in other words, "what we have here, is a failure to communicate." (said with the voice from the warden in the movie "Cool Hand Luke")
This and this!
"an SS109 armor piercing bullet,"
The "knitting needle."
AA