The other day I read that the blade exposure of a Fatip and a Mühle is the same 0.14. I own both but the Fatip is way more comfortable. What I also noticed is how closely the blade follows the arc of the comb (thanks to the shape of the cap). My eyesight is not what it used to be, but there's hardly any blade exposure between the blade and the teeth of the comb, contrary with what I see on the Mühle. Does that maybe explain why the Fatip feels so much more comfortable???
Another thing... the hyped blade alignment issue with the Fatip. Yes I've seen it a few times that either the blade site parallel to the cap but has more exposure on one side than on the other side or 'worse' that there's more blade exposure on the left side of the comb than on the right side. But frankly I've never have that issue cause any problems with the shave? Why can't you just consider it a slant when the blade is not perfectly straight???
Another thing... the hyped blade alignment issue with the Fatip. Yes I've seen it a few times that either the blade site parallel to the cap but has more exposure on one side than on the other side or 'worse' that there's more blade exposure on the left side of the comb than on the right side. But frankly I've never have that issue cause any problems with the shave? Why can't you just consider it a slant when the blade is not perfectly straight???