That wisnae incoherent mumbling, that was Scoatish so it wuz.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Tomato, tomahto.That wisnae incoherent mumbling, that was Scoatish so it wuz.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Enough with these Scottish doctors ... let’s go back to the good old Tennant days.
That seems quite a desperate statement.
I'm sure any one of his three predecessors would have gotten more from each scripts, and made for significantly better episodes.
I'm really glad he's gone, and taken his incoherent mumbling
and one dimensional character portrayal with him.
Enough with these Scottish doctors ... let’s go back to the good old Tennant days.
Those episodes were specifically written for Capaldi's Doctor; of course you can't throw Tennant/Eccleston's Doctor in the exact same script. Imagine trying the reverse. It just doesn't work for the majority of the episodes. Now, I think either of those two would be more interesting to watch in similar episodes. But I honestly thought both of those episodes fell flat. Started interesting, got worse as time went on.Tennant and Ecclestone are great actors, but doing Heaven Sent or Listen? Laughable.
During Moffat's reign the show has had too much focus on the Doctor himself, on how important and great and powerful he is.
I also think it was a mistake to have Capaldi come right after Smith. Capaldi's style is quite different from the other three, and that alone may have driven off many series fans.
During Moffat's reign the show has had too much focus on the Doctor himself, on how important and great and powerful he is.
I sort of see what you're saying there, but it's a strange objection - it would be rather like complaining that Sherlock had far too much Sherlock and not enough Mrs Hudson.
If I understand the objection, it’s not about screentime but character direction. He’s been turned into “space Jesus” instead of a wandering hobo oddball who stumbles into adventures.
That's a pretty good way of putting it. What I was going to say is that the first four seasons generally revolved around a story that our protagonists got thrown into, and in the natural progression of things it would show us how clever the Doctor is. But, the story was (usually) just as important, fun, or interesting as the main characters.If I understand the objection, it’s not about screentime but character direction. He’s been turned into “space Jesus” instead of a wandering hobo oddball who stumbles into adventures.
Sorry, to clarify, I meant fans of the new series. I know that there's an original series, but I have absolutely no interest in watching it. And I get the feeling that I'm not exactly alone with that sentiment. So, in the new series, Capaldi is completely different from the rest of the Doctors, with he and Smith being pretty much polar opposites. Quite different, and not everyone cares for that kind of abrupt change. If there had been a different order, say Eccleston right before Capaldi, it might have been a smoother transition for (newer) fans. But no, baby-face Smith turned into stern(ish) Capaldi, who just sort-of gets angry at everything and can't figure out how to smile. That "dark side" quote from Smith was pretty funny. I really like the line, but I just can't take Smith's appearance/voice seriously.And I think this is the issue - There aren't 3 doctors before Capaldi, there's 11. Fans of Nu Who (Doctors 9-12) might find Capaldi jarring, especially after a string of largely nice Doctors - although Smith definitely played with the darker side - "Good men don't need rules, why do you think I have so many of them".
That's a pretty good way of putting it. What I was going to say is that the first four seasons generally revolved around a story that our protagonists got thrown into, and in the natural progression of things it would show us how clever the Doctor is. But, the story was (usually) just as important, fun, or interesting as the main characters.
During the Moffat era they switched to telling us just how brilliant and special the Doctor is. Constantly. Smith's entire run was basically for the Doctor, about the Doctor. Sure, there were one-offs that more-or-less followed the previous formula. But Smith's entire run was a convoluted mess of a "plot" in which everything in the galaxy must be about the Doctor. There's a problem? Well, turns out it has to do with one (or more) of his enemies setting him up in some way. And, repeatedly, they use the gag of "I'm the Doctor. You've heard of me. I'm unarmed. Run away." *cue the legions of baddies fleeing in terror* It was funny and clever the first time. Not so much the fifth.
Sorry, to clarify, I meant fans of the new series. I know that there's an original series, but I have absolutely no interest in watching it. And I get the feeling that I'm not exactly alone with that sentiment. So, in the new series, Capaldi is completely different from the rest of the Doctors, with he and Smith being pretty much polar opposites. Quite different, and not everyone cares for that kind of abrupt change. If there had been a different order, say Eccleston right before Capaldi, it might have been a smoother transition for (newer) fans. But no, baby-face Smith turned into stern(ish) Capaldi, who just sort-of gets angry at everything and can't figure out how to smile. That "dark side" quote from Smith was pretty funny. I really like the line, but I just can't take Smith's appearance/voice seriously.
Moffat pretty much turned the series into a superhero/supervillain show. And that's the same thing that I didn't care for in the third season finale. Less adventure, more bad-guy being bad because, uh, they're bad. And targeting our pucky hero. On a semi-related note, I really don't care for the sendoffs Moffat's era has had for the companions. Oh, and Moffat ruined the Weeping Angels. Considering "Blink" was my first ever episode, I'm rather irked by that.
Yeah, nearly every episode you mention I didn't care for. Can't argue that. Though I think there's still a distinction between having several episodes set-up like that and having entire seasons devoted to bad guys with complex plans slowly coming after the Doctor. The Silence? The Question? Riversong's backstory? But, clearly, not everyone agrees with my opinion. And that's okay.And that's the same thing that I didn't care for in the third season finale. Less adventure, more bad-guy being bad because, uh, they're bad. And targeting our pucky hero.
Turn Left is on deck for the night- watched Midnight before coming to work (really liked it)His importance to the Universe is spelled out in huge letters in Turn Left, where stars start blinking out because he died in this alternate reality.
All those are at or near the top of my list, so far.One last point. Moffat created the Weeping Angels. He wrote Blink, as well as Girl in the Fireplace, The Empty Child and Silence In the Library. I can't think of better episodes under RTD.