What's new

Why World Cup/Soccer isn't popular in the US?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Every four years, like clockwork, we in America are told that if the US has a strong showing in the World Cup, professional soccer will finally gain acceptance in the mainsteam sports culture. It won't. Why?

Lots of American youth play it, but that doesn't translate to support for MLS teams. Chances are, if you show athletic promise, your Dad's going to push you to baseball, basketball, football, hockey, lacrosse, track and field, etc.--not soccer. Below are my personal theories and they largely contribute to my overall conclusion: soccer is very un-American in nature.

Please submit your own theories. Soccer advocates are also welcome to offer up what they love/appreciate about the game. The intent isn't to bash soccer, but understand why we in America have never embraced it like the rest of the world.

1. Caps: Over the next month you're going to hear a lot about how many "International Caps" a player has under his belt. This is slang for the number of games the guy has played. It's not a match. It's not a Cap. It's a game.

2. 90 minute games: A soccer game could very easily be completed in 60 minutes with the same low score. Moreover, the clock goes up (not down) and doesn't stop when the ref blows the whistle. Ball goes out of bounds? Clock runs. Player hurt and on the ground? Clock runs. The ref will just tack on some time at the end of the game without telling anyone how much time he's decided upon. It's like a secret overtime even if the game isn't tied.

3. Ties: Unless it's an elimination game, you can have ties in soccer. Hockey figured this out a while ago and added shootouts to the end of regular season games. You can't have ties (the NFL does have them...albeit sparingly....like 1-2 a year).

4. Flopping: Over the course of the World Cup you're going to see a lot of the world's best players wildly flailing about after getting tripped and/or bumped in to. As noted above, the clock will continue to run while the trainer jogs out to talk to him in hushed tones. Unlike the NFL, where if they stop the game for a hurt player that player has to leave the field for a play, in soccer he'll get up and continue playing. Why? He wasn't really hurt. He wanted to draw a Red/Yellow card. In the NHL they penalize you for diving. Soccer seems to embrace it.

5. Lack of Substitutions: Three subsitutions per game. Really? Soccer advocates will tell you that this means the players have to have stamina. In reality, the relatively few substitutions means that by the end of the game people are so exhausted from chasing a ball around that two things are happening at an increased rate: 1) Flopping, and 2) Kicking the ball out of bounds. Why? Because in both cases the clock will continue to run. Presumably, this is why the ref adds an unknown amount of secret time to the 90 minutes already allocated in the rule book.

6. Lack of Violence: If someone's going to be paid millions of dollars there had better be some risk of severe bodily harm. Getting kicked in the shin or head butted (Zidane) isn't like taking a 90 mph pitch in the ribs, a puck in the face, or getting hammered by the free safety on a crossing pattern.

7. We're not the best at it.

8. Offsides: You should be able to go anywhere you want on the field. Offsides shouldn't fluctuate based on where the last defender is. In hockey they have blue lines that dictate whether you're offside, not the other team's last defender. In the NFL there is a clear line that says whether you're on the wrong side. You want to open up the field in soccer? Let guys go wherever they want.

9. Hands: Not using 50% of the digits that the good Lord provided doesn't constitute an achievement. The evolution of opposable thumbs is a good thing and should be embraced. And since we're talking about hands, why does the only guy who gets to use his hands get to wear a completely different jersey than the rest of his team? They end up looking like a cross between wild animals and NASCAR. Is it so the ref can tell who's allowed to touch the ball with his hands?

*Note, that not each of these criteria apply to each popular US sport, but by and large our popular sports meet most of these criteria.
 
Last edited:
Solutions:

Cut the size of the field by half.
First team to score three goals wins automatically.
Encourage fighting-no refs allowed.

Eh, I'd still probably not watch it. It's just so boring!
 
I'm not a massive fan of the game having grown up in Australia on a diet of Australian Rules Football, Rugby and Cricket; but I do watch the occasional match and it is obviously huge in this part of the world. I think that you have missed the main reason why football (soccer) hasn't taken off in America..... cash (or lack thereof)!
 
Solutions:

Cut the size of the field by half.
First team to score three goals wins automatically.
Encourage fighting-no refs allowed.

Eh, I'd still probably not watch it. It's just so boring!

Agree, I'd rather have major surgery that be forced to watch soccer. :thumbdown
 
I'm not a massive fan of the game having grown up in Australia on a diet of Australian Rules Football, Rugby and Cricket; but I do watch the occasional match and it is obviously huge in this part of the world. I think that you have missed the main reason why football (soccer) hasn't taken off in America..... cash (or lack thereof)!

Cash? Not sure what you mean. Soccer is so popular in the world because all you need is a ball to play it. Nothing else. Where as football, baseball, hockey you need equipment...which costs money.
 
Well, being European and brought up with football (soccer is the American term) I have to respond :biggrin1:
(I do like to watch NFL as well - Colts fan)

@#2 Maybe, but at least the game will be over in just about 90 minutes. With the half-time break and refs added time we're looking at 110 minutes and not the 180 minutes an NFL game takes where the 60 minutes are commercial breaks.

@#3 You don't have to have a winner in every game. If two teams are equally matched so be it.

@#4 Yes here you are right, they should definitely do more about this issue, although it is more prominent in the leagues in the south of Europe.
The English doesn't like diving and the refs here generally allow more and harder contact than in the rest of Europe.

@#5 Well, they can run for more than 10 seconds before they have to be substituted.
It keeps the cost of players down.
Football is a dynamic game, you can't substitute every time the ball changes direction.
The players are in fact intelligent enough to be able to do more than one task in a game (they are not a bunch of Forest Gumps).

@#6 The American way of football is "sissy rugby", they are covered with protection here there and everywhere.

@#7 You are right again, can't argue here :biggrin1:

And that brings me to the great confusion, why is American football called football, when it is played with the hands? :001_rolle
I have never been able to understand that.
 
SNIP<<<I think that you have missed the main reason why football (soccer) hasn't taken off in America..... cash (or lack thereof)!

Not enough cash?? For sports in general in North America or just for soccer?

I think several of the reasons have already been touched on in posts above, ESPECIALLY relating to fisticuffs. Look at the fans during bench-clearing brawls in hockey and baseball. They act as if that alone was worth the price of the ticket. Look when 2 "heavyweights" go at it in hockey, even when they get on the ice together at a line change. Fans wait for it, and media promote it.

Here, fans and media want more blood and gore than soccer can provide.

I believe one that hasn't been touched on yet is it's cheap enough for everyone to play, as long as you have some reasonably flat land, something for a net, and a ball, and everyone's happy. Many of the countries that excel in soccer aren't "well-off" regarding individual salaries and for maybe the majority of kids, it's the only sport they can play. Whereas in the US and Canada, the majority of kids have parents who can afford the equipment of more expensive sports. (You ever see what it costs to outfit a hockey goalie these days?)
 
Agree, I'd rather have major surgery that be forced to watch soccer. :thumbdown

Too long, too slow, too boring.

I used to hate soccer with a passion. Then in October of '08, I went on a business trip to a small town S/W of Manchester, and guys there got their hands on some tickets and took me to a game, Man United against the Celtics.

I tell ya, that ain't a game, it's a bloody Religion!!

I'm not going to say I'll miss work now to see a World Cup game, but I do have a whole new respect for it after seeing it live, for the following reasons:
  • The size of the field
  • The accuracy those guys have with their feet, and how they can "move the ball", both in the air and on the ground
  • The atheletic conditioning of those guys. Say what you want, to run for that long back and forth with occasional bursts of speed is unbelieveable.
 
The Simpsons are brilliant.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK-gUXl7usc[/YOUTUBE]

Oh man is that funny! :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Truth be told, I actually think soccer can be fun to watch, although I don't generally watch it. I was backpacking in Europe during the 1990 World Cup, and it was easy to get caught up in it. I actually began to understand the startling un-American concept of a game being exciting and low-scoring at the same time. :w00t: Besides, it's more exciting than baseball, at least for me.
 
It's what people are used to IMO. If I grew up in America I'd probably love baseball and gridion. Aussie Rules is played only in Australia and has not caught on anywhere, that does not make it a crap game or boring ( even though the AFL is making it crap).
If you want boring cricket is your game, 5 days of play and no winner:lol:
 
It's what people are used to IMO. If I grew up in America I'd probably love baseball and gridion. Aussie Rules is played only in Australia and has not caught on anywhere, that does not make it a crap game or boring ( even though the AFL is making it crap).
If you want boring cricket is your game, 5 days of play and no winner:lol:

Not to get off topic but I heard Cricket is the most boring game to watch...They even take tea/ lunch breaks.
 
Too long, too slow, too boring. Soccer will never catch on in the US.
I've heard this reason for as long as I've followed soccer and I just don't understand it. There are many NFL games that are boring as hell...defensive battles that end 16-13, the game takes more than 3 hours, play is stopped every minute or so, CONSTANT commercials.....

Now don't get me wrong. I love the NFL. But NFL football is definitely longer, definitely slower, and sometimes even more boring than two Italian teams slogging through a 1-0 soccer game.

And don't even get me STARTED on baseball. Baseball takes forever, has the pace of a snail, and there's usually less than 10 hits per team (while both pitchers throw the ball 400 times).

So I don't think those reasons fly, sorry. I think it's much more a case of what we, as a country, are used to.
 
Not to get off topic but I heard Cricket is the most boring game to watch...They even take tea/ lunch breaks.
Test Cricket is incredibly slow, but the faster forms of the game are actually quite fun to watch. It's just confusing as hell, but I could explain baseball and NFL football in an equally confusing manner.
 
You know, this is something that I don't quite understand... I wonder sometimes if we have been so focused on creating our own identity, that we failed to get just try to fit in. I mean, when we elect a new president, the media calls him the "Leader of the Free World"... With that perspective, I don't think it's coincidence that our most popular sports are the ones that we dominate... Baseball has lost a lot of popularity, and I wonder if it's (at least in part) because many other countries can play with (out play in many cases) us.

For what it's worth, I have never been a soccer player, but I can sit and watch a match (especially World Cup or good professional leagues) as soon as I can watch a NBA or MLB game... In fact, I am constantly awed by the athleticism, stamina, and skill on display by these tremendous athletes.
 
I've heard this reason for as long as I've followed soccer and I just don't understand it. There are many NFL games that are boring as hell...defensive battles that end 16-13, the game takes more than 3 hours, play is stopped every minute or so, CONSTANT commercials.....

Now don't get me wrong. I love the NFL. But NFL football is definitely longer, definitely slower, and sometimes even more boring than two Italian teams slogging through a 1-0 soccer game.

And don't even get me STARTED on baseball. Baseball takes forever, has the pace of a snail, and there's usually less than 10 hits per team (while both pitchers throw the ball 400 times).

So I don't think those reasons fly, sorry. I think it's much more a case of what we, as a country, are used to.

Dad?? Dad, is that you?????

Oh Cripes, I just laughed so hard. Dad said one Sunday afternoon he actually went out and bought a stop-watch to time an NFL game. He said (and I have nothing to indicate whether this is typical) there was an actual playing time if just over 6 minutes for 4 quarters, and the game he timed went to overtime, with less than 45 seconds playing there (dunno how long that OT lasted).

Baseball is a cure for insomnia.

Soccer is steady, seems play keeps going. Not at the excitement level of hockey, or something like that, but still, always moving.
 
I grew up with soccer and lacrosse in NY & I love them to no end. I could easily take a snooze to baseball and football.

I will agree though that if you don't grow up playing it, you probably won't understand the passion.

I'd rather play than watch...
 
Americans do not have the attention span to watch soccer. Football has constent physical contact, basketball has constant moving and scoring, etc. Soccer really does not have that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom