That's what I was taught in the early 70s too.I often use a mug containing a hard puck but I only load the brush from the mug, and then build the lather by face lathering. I do not build the lather on the puck itself, and suggest that to do so would be wasteful of soap. It would make it difficult to control the water to soap ratio as you would be constantly adding more soap with every swirl of the brush. To my mind the purpose of the mug is purely to contain the puck while loading the brush with soap. Following that one would either face lather or transfer to a separate lathering bowl. Opinions may differ of course
I use an Old Spice mug similar to this one. A puck of Arko fits great into it.We read a lot on B&B about different lathering techniques involving modern shaving bowls and scuttles. This got me wondering who still uses a classic shaving mug where the lather is build directly on the puck and then transferred to the face? Something like in the photo (not mine)?
View attachment 1803966
I have a collection of shaving scuttles
These are the Nelson collection View attachment 1804144
Sort of like the 3 NOS all stainless Feather Portable razors I once sold for next to nothing...(And still wish I had kept that mug!! )
That would be me, either an Old Spice mug or Tabac (same size but no handle).... wondering who still uses a classic shaving mug where the lather is build directly on the puck and then transferred to the face?