- Thread starter
- #81
Repeatable for you. But you are only 1 data point. The scientific method generally requires more than 1 data point, so there is a problem if you try to extend your results past your own experience.
Chuck: You're right. I apologize for what I wrote earlier in response to this. I misunderstood your point. Your point is valid. Nevertheless, I wasn't trying to extend my results to others. I collected many repeatable data points in optimizing my sample of MWF. That result was mine and not anyone else's. I'm well aware that there are those that love MWF. It would have been foolish to write the OP without acknowledging that. However, there are those that hate MWF, too, and my results seem to offer one explanation for why some people can't get MWF to work for them even when they're really trying to figure it out.