I think you underestimate a company's motivation to act in order to protect it's interests. A well composed and placed complaint can motivate a company to act where it would not otherwise do so. I didn't suggest you have to mention B&B outright but you can certainly indicate you'll post your concerns publicly and it will likely impact the perception of their product. Pointing out the consequences of action or inaction is simply putting into clear terms what the fallout is likely or potentially to be. If Merkur wants to infer such as a threat, then that is their problem. If they want to view this as an opportunity to protect or improve their customer relations, that's their prerogative too. The OP has nothing to lose because he already tried the soft and diplomatic approach and received a polite but resounding brush off.I disagree. I think Merkur can work out the negative consequences for themselves, IF they really do have a quality problem that needs addressing.
As I posted earlier, to bring B&B into it, and point out these plain commercial facts to them, is only likely to be read as threats and intimidation - no matter how politely you word it.
And that doesn't predispose any company to progress with that complaint.
Not that it needs to be said but businesses do want to know what their customer's think and will act accordingly, at least the ones that want to be successful in the long run. I work closely with a friend to develop telescope software and the company he works for closely monitors many astronomy forums to get the pulse of their product perception.
Last edited: