This is gold. On the first imaginings of Dr Who
BBC - Archive - The Genesis of Doctor Who - Background Notes for 'Dr. Who'
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Dibs on Cliff as my new Doctor Who associated user name.
This is gold. On the first imaginings of Dr Who
BBC - Archive - The Genesis of Doctor Who - Background Notes for 'Dr. Who'
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I think the show would do well dispensing with all of their social causes/justice "campaigns" and follow the genesis background notes.
DR. WHO A frail old man lost in space and time. They give him this name because they don't know who he is. He seems not to remember where he has come from; he is suspicious and capable of sudden malignance; he seems to have some undefined enemy; he is searching for something as well as fleeing from something. He has a "machine" which enables them to travel together through time, through space, and through matter.
Neither are we writing fantasy: the events have got to be credible to the three ordinary people who are our main characters, and they are sharp-witted enough to spot a phoney.
Sci Fi stories have been inspired by the social questions of the day going all the way back to HG Wells. Why would Doctor Who be any different?
The Secret of Dr. Who: In his own day, somewhere in our future, he decided to search for a time or for a society or for a physical condition which is ideal, and having found it, to stay there. He stole the machine and set forth on his quest. He is thus an extension of the scientist who has opted out, but he has opted farther than ours can do, at tne moment. And having opted out, he is disintegrating.
[Handwritten note from Sydney Newman: "Don't like this at all. Dr Who will become a kind of father figure - I don't want him to be a reactionary."]
One symptom of this is his hatred of scientist, inventors, improvers. He can get into a rare paddy when faced witn a cave man trying to invent a wheel. He malignantly tries to stop progress (the future) wherever he finds it, while searching for his ideal (the past). This seems to me to involve slap up-to-date moral problems, and old ones too.
I can see that. Moral "grey areas" tend to be far more thought-provoking than evil corporations or aliens that are obsessed with killing/enslaving everyone. One of the better examples of that was (spoilers!) when the reptile-people (saurians?) were waking up underground and they had to decide who "owned" the planet. Still a little on the simplistic side, but at least there wasn't an obvious "right" answer.I think the problem with the current approach to dealing with up-to-date moral problems isn't so much that they are doing it, but the simplistic, one-sided, over-the-top, beat-you-in-the-head-with-our-moralising approach they take.
One symptom of this is his hatred of scientist, inventors, improvers. He can get into a rare paddy when faced witn a cave man trying to invent a wheel. He malignantly tries to stop progress (the future) wherever he finds it, while searching for his ideal (the past).
One of the better examples of that was (spoilers!) when the reptile-people (saurians?) were waking up underground and they had to decide who "owned" the planet.
They're outraged at a single person dying in front of them, but finding out they're on a ghost ship that was effectively the site of genocide? No big deal.
Who is forcing you to watch Who?There's a difference between being inspired by and cramming social agendas down our throats.
Who is forcing you to watch Who?
It's like someone took your favourite old sweater ... the one you've worn and loved for years ... and laminated on a "vote for XXX" slogan (insert the name of whichever politician you yourself find particularly disturbing. Trump or Clinton, Cameron or Corbyn, so on and so forth) so now the sweater is "ruined" as far as you are concerned.
Nobody's forcing you to wear the sweater.
But something you have loved and enjoyed for years and years now has an unsavoury (to you) message that is glaring at you every time you try to enjoy your old fabvourite. Dang shame.
DOCTOR: Well, I don't like it either. Well, it's all right up until the eyebrows. Then it just goes haywire. Look at the eyebrows. These are attack eyebrows. You could take bottle tops off with these.For the life of me, I can’t figure out what unsavory messages Doctor Who has been sending. I thought letting Capaldi speak in his Scottish accent was progress compared to what they made Tennant do.
On a related note, I've found that they sometimes gloss over truly horrible occurrences. In "dinosaurs in space" (or was it "on a spaceship?") they quietly shuffled past the horrible truth of what happened to the crew. Seriously: they were woken up from stasis, one by one, and dragged to an airlock where they were then thrown out into the void. Maybe it's just me, but I find that to be one of Dr. Who's darkest, most morbid moments--and certainly one which had little impact on the main characters. They're outraged at a single person dying in front of them, but finding out they're on a ghost ship that was effectively the site of genocide? No big deal.
Solomon: Whatever you want I can get it for you. Whatever object you desire.
The Doctor: Did the Silurians beg you to stop? Look Solomon. The missiles. See them shine, see how valuable they are? And they’re all yours.
Solomon: You wouldn’t leave me, Doctor.
The Doctor: Enjoy your bounty.
It's like someone took your favourite old sweater ... the one you've worn and loved for years ... and laminated on a "vote for XXX" slogan (insert the name of whichever politician you yourself find particularly disturbing. Trump or Clinton, Cameron or Corbyn, so on and so forth) so now the sweater is "ruined" as far as you are concerned.
Nobody's forcing you to wear the sweater.
But something you have loved and enjoyed for years and years now has an unsavoury (to you) message that is glaring at you every time you try to enjoy your old fabvourite. Dang shame.
Sure, the bad guy got what was coming to him, but I personally would have expected the truth of the situation to hit the main characters a lot harder than it did. They're running around, having fun, then discover this really dark truth. Yet I don't think the tone changed much to reflect that.Did you stop before the end?