I've had my stainless steel Blackbird for about a month or so, and I had previously posted some comparison shaves with it and a brass Karve Christopher Bradley (safety bar G plate) and Blackland Dart. Those were with the original, short handle, and the Blackbird and Karve yielded very similar results. I found that handle a bit shorter than I liked with my big (and perhaps clumsy) hands, particularly for the ATG upward pass. So I fitted it out with a RazoRock Titanium Halo handle. That combination felt great in my hand, but I began to notice that on days that I used the Blackbird, my face was not as smooth post shave, and by evening was much rougher, than on days I used the Karve. So today, I put the original handle back on my Blackbird, and sure enough the results are much better. The question I am left with is - why?
Is it the difference in weight between the two handles? The stainless handle is about 4 grams heavier, so that doesn't seem like all that much. Does a longer handle cause an involuntary change in the angle at which I hold the razor to my face? I really dislike experimenting with different shaving angles, as in the past this has resulted in some significant damage to my face, but maybe I need to consider this. I'm guessing that a longer handle would encourage a steeper angle; does that sound right? So with the Halo handle I ought to try to lift the handle a bit away from my face?
Is it the difference in weight between the two handles? The stainless handle is about 4 grams heavier, so that doesn't seem like all that much. Does a longer handle cause an involuntary change in the angle at which I hold the razor to my face? I really dislike experimenting with different shaving angles, as in the past this has resulted in some significant damage to my face, but maybe I need to consider this. I'm guessing that a longer handle would encourage a steeper angle; does that sound right? So with the Halo handle I ought to try to lift the handle a bit away from my face?