A People's History of the United states by Howard Zinn.
The Silmarillion. It’s been 30 years since my last read. It remains a tough book, but is one of those that really rewards you if you stick out the first 100 pages or so.
+1Very good read.
The Caine Mutiny by Herman Wouk.
A People's History of the United states by Howard Zinn.
Zinn...well, unfortunately, I put him in the biased category. There's a book called Debunking Howard Zinn that may be well worth your time.
Wasn't impressed by it, but had learned enough US History to catch errors in my college history textbook. That, sadly enough, isn't saying all that much. In the case of the textbook, it was an issue of incompetance. If the authors had bothered to read an account of someone who was there, they wouldn't have pulled that howler (that's how I caught it).
Zinn...well, unfortunately, I put him in the biased category. There's a book called Debunking Howard Zinn that may be well worth your time.
I do not need to take sides. but I would say Mary Grabar, the author of Debunking Howard Zinn, has her own agenda. I do not think Howard Zinn was shy about where he was coming from. He is well-known for saying that he was "something of an anarchist, something of a socialist. Maybe a democratic socialist."
I would say not so much my college history text books, but my high school text books, were not very accurate or in depth. By the time I took a graduate level course in diplomatic history, things became more nuanced and seemed to better reflect what really happened. I would encourage everyone to have an interest in history and to read broadly. I think Howard Zinn himself said that all history is written through particular lenses.
G.K. Chesterson observed that before you take down a fence, you should know why it was put up. The other side of that is if you find someone destroying a fence, you should find out why.
G.K. Chesterton is great!
Still, a very good read...
This is maybe worthy of another subject heading. Not because of Howard Zinn, but in the unfortunate tendency of historians in not quite giving a full picture and making outright errors. What really soured me wasn't Zinn, but reading Thomas Paine and discovering he was a deist and not the atheist I'd been taught he was.
G.K. Chesterton had a turn of phrase in making a point that can be unexpected, like rounding a bend and discovering a breathtaking vista you didn't know was there.