AimlessWanderer
Remember to forget me!
They do, indeed, look more refined than the Wallabee, but my reflexively TNSIL sensibility misses the squared off tie, even though it is endearingly klunky. It is the same sensibility that does not appreciate penny loafers, tassel loafers, or Norwegian split toes that are not Aldens. Even if they are lovely, they just don't look "right." It is a sickness that has lingered since prep school when you could be ostracized for wearing shoes that were not Weejuns, even if they were nice and even if they cost more.
I'm not brand loyal in any way, never have been, but I am a stickler for my own style "rules", even if they are completely wrong to everyone else's mind. And yes, I do find myself misaligned with people rather often on style issues
These shoes look very well made and very comfortable, but wave a red flag at my aversion to profound "rain-catcher" tops. A completely irrational feeling, as they're clearly not rainy day shoes, I am currently typing this whilst wearing moccasin slippers, and I am a fan of deck shoes (I have three pairs) ... yet I'm afraid that pronounced pie crust is a big no-no for me. Sorry.
I hope they feel as comfortable as they look though.
Now, I want different kinds of shoes. I guess you could say more casual, if not eclectic. Instead of a balmoral, how about Chelsea boots? Instead of wingtips, how about a chukka? Instead of shell cordovan, how about some suede? Instead of leather soles, how about some crepe?
I'm going through something similar myself. Since disability stopped me working, there's been a bit (actually a heck of a lot) of loss of self-identity. I think that may be what my recent shoe flurry has been fueled by. I think I've bought 10 pairs of shoes so far this year (all entry level "budget" offerings, just to test the feel of the style), and still don't feel "settled". Chelsea boots and desert boots never appealed before, but now I find myself scouring for bargains on them. I would never have bought two tone brogues before, nor a sole with a tread depth of less than 3mm, yet I've bought several this year.
I reckon it's a breakdown in the old "rules", and a bit of voyage of self-discovery as to what I might feel comfortable wearing now both me and my lifestyle are completely changed. That said, some of the old rules seem too deeply ingrained to shift. The rain-catcher top being just one example. Tassles and horizontal bands on loafers being another. I find monk shoes really quite repulsive, but for some unfathomable reason, I am frequently looking for ones that I don't find ugly...