+2! There is only one vote that counts!!
Unless you consider the spousal “you already have enough” veto to be a vote
+2! There is only one vote that counts!!
Me. I like a bulb better. It lathers more efficiently for me than a fan. I like the way it splays better. I do have a couple of fans for variety though.I am rapidly becoming a (fan) of fan shaped knots and losing interest in the bulb shapes. Is there anyone on this thread that prefers a bulb shape...and why? I am curious.
I think my favorite would be a flat top without too much back bone. I have a Shavemac Flattop in D01. I would do a longer loft with it than I did or a different hair entirely. I have no complaints with the quality, just my choices.Me. I like a bulb better. It lathers more efficiently for me than a fan. I like the way it splays better. I do have a couple of fans for variety though.
Me. I like a bulb better. It lathers more efficiently for me than a fan. I like the way it splays better. I do have a couple of fans for variety though.
What would your settings be for a Shavemac synth and how would the brush behave after it (backbone, splay) ? Just curios.I have used the following:
Simpson Chubby 2
Simpson Trafalgar 2
One Blade Synth
Plissoft (from Plisson)
Razorock something or other 400 with the black knot
3 different PAA brushes
Supply Synth
Shavemac Synth
Muhle STF
I strongly favor the Muhle, thought the Shavemac could be very good if I had made different choices in loft and whatnot - now that I understand that fiber, I could build a much better brush than I did with their selector and I might.
From what I've read in the past couple years the smaller STF diameters don't garner the rave reviews that the 25mm knot does. I believe its the diameter/loft ratio that makes the biggest difference.OTOH, poking around some more, there are STFs at 23, 21, and even 19mm. Definitely curious to get comparisons between some of these brushes from people who own more than 1.
Unless you consider the spousal “you already have enough” veto to be a vote
Interesting, I hadn't noticed that, but I hadn't looked either. I'd probably gravitate toward a 21 or 23mm, so I'll keep that in mind if I start looking seriously at a STF.From what I've read in the past couple years the smaller STF diameters don't garner the rave reviews that the 25mm knot does. I believe its the diameter/loft ratio that makes the biggest difference.
I'm 100% face latherer and also am starting to lean toward fans. I haven't seen STF knots available for purchase separately, but a few people on the previous page have indicated that Rudy Vey uses them, so I guess he has a source!I personally have never used the STF fibre brushes because I prefer a fan or hybrid fan over the bulb version that the STF is offered in. To me the fan knots splay easier than bulbs and being a 100% face latherer this is fan is better to me. If they ever decide to do a fan version I would probably be the 1st in line to pick one up. I would also require to purchase the knot separately to assemble my own brush which I believe nobody sells the knot only!!
Most of my brushes are 26 mm.Thanks for the reply.
I really am trying to appreciate bulb knots. I think maybe they would work better for me if I had a larger size knot than the Simpson Emperor and Shavemac Beagle.
The larger size is beginning to make more sense to me. ThanksMost of my brushes are 26 mm.
Yeah, soft like a porcupine. I wouldn't even PIF that one and used it as a keyboard cleaner until it was lost in a move.
I went 24mm bulb and minus 2 mm on the hair length.What would your settings be for a Shavemac synth and how would the brush behave after it (backbone, splay) ? Just curios.
Plenty of nice 22 mm natural fiber brushes out there, but I think very few synths in that size. I think the fibers are not correct for building that size yet.The larger size is beginning to make more sense to me. Thanks
For bowl lathering, most synthetic brushes do, at least, an adequate job. So, if you're bowl lathering and face painting, the synthetic bang for the buck can't be beat. I've never face lathered, so I couldn't say how they compare with a boar or a badger in that category. Early on in my wet shaving journey, I bought an inexpensive Parker badger brush...$25. It was fine until my Airedale puppy got a hold of it. But of all the synthetic brushes I own, the one that comes closest to that Parker from a look and feel perspective are my AP Shave Co G5A brushes. I have a number of them and they all excel at bowl lathering and face painting.
Honestly, I never could get into the whole expensive brush scene...which is probably why I have a collection of synthetics. Who knows...maybe
For the price of the Evo 2.0, you can buy a Zenith Manchurian M23someday I'll break down and buy that Omega Evo 2 brush.
@T Bone - If you want to get your feet wet in the wide world of synthetic brushes without breaking your budget, here are 5 brushes that are pretty darn good for the money:
View attachment 1498514
Left to right:
AP Shave Co 24 mm Cashmere
RazoRock Hive 24 Mokasoft HD
Turn 'N Shave Chess 24mm BOSS
AP Shave Co Elegant Emerald 24mm Synbad
PAA Peregrino 24mm Roswell Hybrid
If memory serves, none of these brushes are over US$20.
The Cashmere will be the softest and have the least backbone. The BOSS will have the most.
Of these five brushes, I use the AP Shave Co Elegant Emerald 24mm Synbad and the RazoRock Hive 24 Mokasoft HD the most.
Hope this helps.
You are most welcome. Please let me know your thoughts regarding them.Thanks for your post. I just ordered the RazoRock and Turn 'n Shave brushes! That Turn n' Shave will be my first BOSS knot.