What's new

New way to use an adjustable?

Haha, just surfing auctions and found a slim adjustable. In the description:

...The handle is textured and balanced so it feels great in your hand, there's an adjustor wheel up towards the blade that numbers from 1 - 9 that is so finite and precise I use it to count how many shaves are on the blade...

This really cracked me up.
 

luvmysuper

My elbows leak
Staff member
Haha, just surfing auctions and found a slim adjustable. In the description:

...The handle is textured and balanced so it feels great in your hand, there's an adjustor wheel up towards the blade that numbers from 1 - 9 that is so finite and precise I use it to count how many shaves are on the blade...

This really cracked me up.

:lol:
That is funny.

Guess it could have been worse - maybe an ad for a new shaving abacus.
 
Maybe the Aristocrats keep multiplying in his shave drawer when the lights are out. But looking at the picture, his definition of gold is not the same as mine.

Bon chance!
 
Quite logical - a blade gets duller with each shave, so the exposure is increased as the "count" is adjusted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:001_smile
 
Maybe the Aristocrats keep multiplying in his shave drawer when the lights are out. But looking at the picture, his definition of gold is not the same as mine.

Bon chance!

Maybe there is a lot of plate loss. The brass is 'gold-like.'
 
That might be an indication that the adjuster ring functions better as a counter than as an adjustment on his particular razor.

- Chris
 
The photos in that listing look like they were intentionally blurred using photoshop, not by the lens of the camera. To have a razor thin depth-of-field like that, and still be getting the whole razor in the photo, he would have had to be waaaay back with a long telephoto taking those. Since it looks like they were taken from above, like the razor was laying on a table, it seems unlikely he was far away. On top of that, the sharp areas don't match up. The edge of the closed comb is in focus, as is _part_ of the handle? Someone explain how that could happen. It doesn't make sense.
 
The photos in that listing look like they were intentionally blurred using photoshop, not by the lens of the camera. To have a razor thin depth-of-field like that, and still be getting the whole razor in the photo, he would have had to be waaaay back with a long telephoto taking those. Since it looks like they were taken from above, like the razor was laying on a table, it seems unlikely he was far away. On top of that, the sharp areas don't match up. The edge of the closed comb is in focus, as is _part_ of the handle? Someone explain how that could happen. It doesn't make sense.


He might be using a scanner to take the pictures.
 
Top Bottom