Hi! My name is Noorm and I'm an addict. I'm addicted to shavettes!
I'm not here to discuss the pros and cons of shavettes vs. real straight... I'm not here to discuss the dangers of shaving with a shavettes...
I'm here to give an overview of what shavettes styles are available on the market for regular double edged (DE) blades.
First off, kudos to Petesurfer who coined the term Shavettes Acquisition Disorder or SAD: http://badgerandblade.com/vb/showpost.php?p=606229&postcount=19&highlight=shavettes+acquisition+disorder
Now, two pictures that will be central to my "review"!
The list (in order from left to right):
There is three basic mechanism. The Shaving Shack, Sanguine and Parker use two "massive" metal plate to squeeze the blade in a sandwich. The Focus and DOVO use a plastic holder. The TRI and Diane use some kind of sheet metal holder.
Both the Focus and DOVO use a plastic "hinge" that will no doubt break with time and use. So these two might need a replacement holder in a while. The price on the DOVO shavette is also quite mad at more than double the next highly priced shavette.
The sheet metal holder of the TRI and Diane should not break. I think it's a better solution but they are still very light. Also, in a normal straight shaving position, your thumb will rest on the metal holder. That holder remain in place by a very light friction so I think it COULD move during shaving (The blade would do a slicing motion on your face if the holder move).
Finally, the more robust and heavy Shaving Shack, Sanguine and Parker. At that price, I don't think you should buy anything else. The finish on the Shaving Shack and Sanguine is pretty good. The Parker I received was a bit warped and had some kind of scratching on it. The polish wasn't as good as the two other either. The Sanguine feel a little light. The Shaving Shack one is my favorite.
Maybe I'll find a scale to put some number in there...!
Higher resolution picture (a bit fuzzy, but still better) there: http://badgerandblade.com/gallery/browseimages.php?c=3&userid=30272
I'm not here to discuss the pros and cons of shavettes vs. real straight... I'm not here to discuss the dangers of shaving with a shavettes...
I'm here to give an overview of what shavettes styles are available on the market for regular double edged (DE) blades.
First off, kudos to Petesurfer who coined the term Shavettes Acquisition Disorder or SAD: http://badgerandblade.com/vb/showpost.php?p=606229&postcount=19&highlight=shavettes+acquisition+disorder
Now, two pictures that will be central to my "review"!
The list (in order from left to right):
Code:
Shaving Shack Shavette $11.75
Sanguine XD20 $11.69
Parker SR1 $15.75
Focus Folding Razor $8.42
DOVO Shavette $36.75
TRI Folding Razor $3.48
Diane 204 $8.87
There is three basic mechanism. The Shaving Shack, Sanguine and Parker use two "massive" metal plate to squeeze the blade in a sandwich. The Focus and DOVO use a plastic holder. The TRI and Diane use some kind of sheet metal holder.
Both the Focus and DOVO use a plastic "hinge" that will no doubt break with time and use. So these two might need a replacement holder in a while. The price on the DOVO shavette is also quite mad at more than double the next highly priced shavette.
The sheet metal holder of the TRI and Diane should not break. I think it's a better solution but they are still very light. Also, in a normal straight shaving position, your thumb will rest on the metal holder. That holder remain in place by a very light friction so I think it COULD move during shaving (The blade would do a slicing motion on your face if the holder move).
Finally, the more robust and heavy Shaving Shack, Sanguine and Parker. At that price, I don't think you should buy anything else. The finish on the Shaving Shack and Sanguine is pretty good. The Parker I received was a bit warped and had some kind of scratching on it. The polish wasn't as good as the two other either. The Sanguine feel a little light. The Shaving Shack one is my favorite.
Maybe I'll find a scale to put some number in there...!
Higher resolution picture (a bit fuzzy, but still better) there: http://badgerandblade.com/gallery/browseimages.php?c=3&userid=30272
Last edited by a moderator: