I prefer a tech. That said, I have both the 72 and the 95 and I much prefer the 95. It is very efficient and has some blade feel but it does not leave irritation. It also doesn't shred my face. It is a marvel and I would highly recommend it.
I’d say one of the top confusing topics in wet shaving!Confused.
I prefer a tech. That said, I have both the 72 and the 95 and I much prefer the 95. It is very efficient and has some blade feel but it does not leave irritation. It also doesn't shred my face. It is a marvel and I would highly recommend it.
Does the 72 irritate your face? Or is it that the 72 is closer to the Tech?
I know you asked someone else, but I had a similar experience. The 72 lupo irritated my face for some reason while the 95 is still super smooth without the irritation. Much better plate for me. I don't really understand why the 95 would be more comfortable than the 72, but it is much better for me.
I know you asked someone else, but I had a similar experience. The 72 lupo irritated my face for some reason while the 95 is still super smooth without the irritation. Much better plate for me. I don't really understand why the 95 would be more comfortable than the 72, but it is much better for me.
It's possible that the 72 was pulling more than cutting. Do you have issues with mild razors in general, or was it just the 72? You might want to try a different blade on the 72 to see if it works better. Sometimes finding that combo of razor and blade makes a world of difference.
I tried several different blades and all were the same....irritation. I don't typically have issues with mild razors so not sure why the 72 bothered me. It definitely was cutting...results were smooth, but skin was left irritated. The 95 shaves just as smooth as the 72, just as close (or closer) without said irritation. It's an anomaly.
Maybe the rigid blade design hides the efficiency feel. You are not able to feel the blade as much. As a result you might use more pressure on the 72 . I experianced this with my tatara razor, when using a combination quite similar to the lupo (nodachi top cap, masamune base plate). It felt great during the shave, but post shave was not that good. I am not shure how much positive blade exposure the lupo 72 has. I like the open comb side best. I would like to see a full 72 open comb lupo head.I tried several different blades and all were the same....irritation. I don't typically have issues with mild razors so not sure why the 72 bothered me. It definitely was cutting...results were smooth, but skin was left irritated. The 95 shaves just as smooth as the 72, just as close (or closer) without said irritation. It's an anomaly.
Maybe the rigid blade design hides the efficiency feel. You are not able to feel the blade as much. As a result you might use more pressure on the 72 . I experianced this with my tatara razor, when using a combination quite similar to the lupo (nodachi top cap, masamune base plate). It felt great during the shave, but post shave was not that good. I am not shure how much positive blade exposure the lupo 72 has. I like the open comb side best. I would like to see a full 72 open comb lupo head.
Does the 72 irritate your face? Or is it that the 72 is closer to the Tech?
Neither irritate my face, the main differences between the 72 and the 95 is the 72 has less blade feel and takes a bit more effort to get your face smooth.
Neither really feel like a tech. The 72 has more blade feel than the tech.
If you have not tried the open comb tatara base plates, they are better than the sb plates (in my opinion). They clamp the blade even stiffer. Handle weight also factor in.I guess that's a possible theory. I too have the Tatara and have tried all baseplate/top cap combinations from full Masamune to full Nodachi and never experienced any issues. As a matter of fact the Nodachi setup is turning out to be the best performing razor I have. I find it very smooth, comfortable and efficient. I have the Masamune handle with all the solid bar options.....love it.
There is just something about the 72 Lupo that doesn't agree with me that doesn't rear its head in the 95 version. Maybe it's something I'm doing, but I shave the same way with the 95 without any irritation. I'm happy with the 95. It punches well above its price point and will stay in my rotation. The 72 plate will remain in the drawer.
The blade gap isn´t the only parameter for "aggressiveness".I tried several different blades and all were the same....irritation. I don't typically have issues with mild razors so not sure why the 72 bothered me. It definitely was cutting...results were smooth, but skin was left irritated. The 95 shaves just as smooth as the 72, just as close (or closer) without said irritation. It's an anomaly.