I am curios.
Can Rockwell 6s/6c replace a Merkur 34 or EJ de89? If yes, which plate?
Can Rockwell 6s/6c replace a Merkur 34 or EJ de89? If yes, which plate?
I'd say plate 3 is similar to the 34C.I am curios.
Can Rockwell 6s/6c replace a Merkur 34 or EJ de89? If yes, which plate?
I am curios.
Can Rockwell 6s/6c replace a Merkur 34 or EJ de89? If yes, which plate?
A different feel, no question. I don't have a DE89, but the 6S is more similar in feel to the DE89 clone I have, the RR MJ-90, than to the 34C. But the MJ-90 is aluminum and titanium and weighs half as much as the steel 6S.As previously posted somewhere around 2 or 3 would be where the 34C equivalent is. BUT...I find R3 to be more efficient in general so I would say "2.5" for my own comparison of the two.
People who dismiss Zamac out of hand are hard to take seriously. Be that as it may, Progress and Variant more aggressive wide open, not as smooth as Rockwell. I enjoy both and plan on keeping both.Anyone tried a Variant (zamac head, ick I know) or FB next to this?
A different feel, no question. I don't have a DE89, but the 6S is more similar in feel to the DE89 clone I have, the RR MJ-90, than to the 34C. But the MJ-90 is aluminum and titanium and weighs half as much as the steel 6S.
Anyone tried a Variant (zamac head, ick I know) or FB next to this?
Some discussion in another thread about the exact weight of the 6S, but my final answer: 118.5 grams.Yes it certainly does have a substantial heft to it.
People who dismiss Zamac out of hand are hard to take seriously. Be that as it may, Progress and Variant more aggressive wide open, not as smooth as Rockwell. I enjoy both and plan on keeping both.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
No question that for me while the Variant and FB can be set to levels of efficiency comparable to the 6s (or in excess of even), none of them offer the smoothness the Rockwell has given me. Literally just flawless shave after another with an unprecedented degree of forgiveness.
well it was on to plate 4 today after shaving with plate 3 two days ago (and skipping a day in between). I got a nice close shave on my two day old stubble after a 3 pass effort. This is on a Feather blade with two prior shaves on it.Indeed sir
One thing about the Rockwell that concerns me is that the Feather blade I use needs to be aligned so that it is not slanted. There appears to be a little slop in the system. Hmm...
One thing about the Rockwell that concerns me is that the Feather blade I use needs to be aligned so that it is not slanted. There appears to be a little slop in the system. Hmm...
Do you have a picture of that issue? I have ordered a 6S that is still in the mail system as of today and I bought this particular razor because the previous Fendrihan Stainless Steel razor I had was having major alignment issue. I read a lot of great reviews online that said the Rockwell had perfect blade alignment. So I am a little confused now. :-S
I had to align the blade twice, once each time in advance of a shave. By aligning I mean lining the edge of the blade so that it was parallel to the edge of the plate underneath. I just spent the last 5 minutes trying to replicate the problem and was successful in doing so. The plate has two posts which come through the blade equidistant from its center. There is some play between the posts and the blade i.e. I can move the blade around so that it is slanted. When I was trying to replicate the problem I had to move the blade. When I first noticed the problem, it occurred twice without any manipulation on my part. This is a subtle thing and I am not sure my photographic skills will allow me to demonstrate the issue. I have left the blade misaligned and will attempt a picture tomorrow.