Recently started DE shaving and at the advice of a number of members, my first razor was a Tech. Not wanting to order the super blue version from China, I got an Indian market 7 O’clock Sterling version from a seller local to me.
Being my first razor, I had nothing to compare it to and had no idea if it was good or bad.
I then ordered a $5 Lord L6 (LP1822L) and was blown away at how much better it shaves than that Sterling Tech. It’s light years better, in every possible way.
Less picky about angle, less picky about blades, less grabby, more smooth WTG/ATG/XTG, less irritation afterwards, more efficient, etc.
It’s so smooth and intuitive that I feel like I couldn’t cut myself with it even if I tried.
I don’t know if maybe that Sterling Tech was a dud? Or maybe I’m using it wrong?
Surely the differences between them shouldn’t be so drastic?
Yes the Lord feels and looks cheap, but it shaves like a dream. (I’ve ordered 4 more to give to some of my buddies to try to get them into DE shaving).
In reading comments and reviews on it, it seems most everyone is in agreement that it provides a really nice shave.
What makes it such a good shaving razor? Clearly the magic isn’t in the materials or manufacturing process.
I see people say it’s based on the Merkur 34c, but a number of people say they don’t shave the same, and some even say the L6 shaves better.
Also, the blade gaps are notably different- 0.71 for the 34c, 1.09 for the Lord L6.
Is that 1.09 blade gap part of the reason it shaves so good?
I’m just trying to understand what makes a razor shave so well.
Being my first razor, I had nothing to compare it to and had no idea if it was good or bad.
I then ordered a $5 Lord L6 (LP1822L) and was blown away at how much better it shaves than that Sterling Tech. It’s light years better, in every possible way.
Less picky about angle, less picky about blades, less grabby, more smooth WTG/ATG/XTG, less irritation afterwards, more efficient, etc.
It’s so smooth and intuitive that I feel like I couldn’t cut myself with it even if I tried.
I don’t know if maybe that Sterling Tech was a dud? Or maybe I’m using it wrong?
Surely the differences between them shouldn’t be so drastic?
Yes the Lord feels and looks cheap, but it shaves like a dream. (I’ve ordered 4 more to give to some of my buddies to try to get them into DE shaving).
In reading comments and reviews on it, it seems most everyone is in agreement that it provides a really nice shave.
What makes it such a good shaving razor? Clearly the magic isn’t in the materials or manufacturing process.
I see people say it’s based on the Merkur 34c, but a number of people say they don’t shave the same, and some even say the L6 shaves better.
Also, the blade gaps are notably different- 0.71 for the 34c, 1.09 for the Lord L6.
Is that 1.09 blade gap part of the reason it shaves so good?
I’m just trying to understand what makes a razor shave so well.