- Thread starter
- #21
Looks like A wr1 .48 gap would not be efficient even if the blade exposure is positive/great. a slim adjustable at 2 is rough 0.43mm , and thats not far from .48 And a slims gap at setting 2 isn't wide enough to efficient enough to accomplish much.You're on the right track.
WR1 Gap/Blade Exposure
.48 = -0.14
.54 = -0.06
.61 = +0.02
.67 = +0.10
.74 = +0.18
.80 = +0.28
WR2 Gap/Blade Exposure
.75 = -0.150mm
.85 = -0.09mm
.95 = -0.05
1.05 = +.01
1.15 = .06
1.25 = .11
1.35 = .16
1.45 = .21
1.55 = .26
My WR1 .74 has much more blade feel than my WR2 1.05 or even the WR2 1.25
I agree with @kingfisher that the wr1 .61 might be suitable if you prefer a thin head. The WR1 is the easiest razor I've ever used to get right up under my nostrils with the Razorock SS Lupo coming in a close second. I don't mean ATG or XTG contortions, just place the edge/corner of the WR1 right up in there at the slightest angle WTG and shave it right off. The WR2 (although very smooth) is a more bulky head and lacks the nimbleness of the WR1.
I think the Slim gap (as far as I can find) on setting 3 is 0.022 inch, so 0.55mm and 0.017 inch or 0.43mm at setting 2. I have no idea on the blade exposure for the Slim.