What's new

Razor wars - DSCosmetics AX 1.55SB versus Yaqi Sentinel 1.50SB

Guido75

Is it swell time?
Another comparison of razors in my den in part made possible by Glenn @megamac.

This time a newcomer being the Wolfman WR2 clone AX and a semi sibling being the Yaqi Sentinel, a Wolfman inspired razor.

IMG_5174.jpeg


DSCosmetics AX

I have read in various reviews that the AX is the closest clone / copy to the real WR2 - some state about 90% similar, but as far as my intelligence goes the blade exposure is nowhere near the one you have with a Wolfman with a 1.55 blade gap. The blade exposure on the real Wolfman is .40mm. I think James' take on the Tech-like WR2 is one of the most beautiful razor designs to hit the market. And just by looks this AX comes very close.

My AX (also known as Poleaxe) has a blade gap of 1.55mm and judging by the website the blade exposure is 0.06mm. This is by far the widest gap I have. The blade exposure is in my regular ball park. The razor has a wide angle to choose from and going shallow sort of neutralises the positive exposure.

The razor is all stainless steel. Three piece razor. The head weighs 35 grams and the handle I used (Razorock Barberpole) is 67 grams, so the entire razor in this comparison is about 101 grams. The blade clamping is extremely tight and is so tight that the blade is forced into position. This in itself is a good thing. However, the blade definitely needs help being released from the cap. That is fairly easy to do by the way, but it does require some effort.

The only real peeve I have with the razor is the threading on the cap. The Barberpole fits easily and smoothly whereas other handles lock at a certain point. What I really like is full blade coverage, so no side parts hanging out.

The shave is really smooth and comfortable. This can depend on the blade, but with that huge gap considering, the razor is extremely smooth. It communicates confidence to the user which is very helpful in using it. Very effective razor as well. Higher end blades, like Nacet or Gillette Platinum require some precautions, but overall it isn´t really blade picky.

Yaqi Sentinel 1.50SB

Like the AX, the Sentinel is an all stainless razor head. It also weighs 35 grams and I have fitted it with the same Barberpole handle. Blade gap is 1.50, so every so slightly less than the AX while the exposure seems to be on par. According to the website it is .05mm. The Sentinel is a very smooth shaver that feels extremely comfortable to the skin. Meanwhile it is equally effective and can bring a beard down without effort. And a proper blade of course.

IMG_5175.jpeg

(Sentinel left, AX right)

IMG_5176.jpeg


So they seem very very similar, but there are differences as well. The caps, for example, are not exchangeable as the width is different by 1mm or 2 mm. What I also think is that the Sentinel (mine at least) has been chromed, whereas the AX is polished stainless steel. The reason for my thinking is that the baseplate ring where the cap post goes through is recessed but in a way that reminds me of Zamak. See the baseplate for the AX and the post ring there is clearly CNC tight. Furthermore the AX has one lather slot on each side and the Sentinel has two.

IMG_5177.jpeg

The Sentinel baseplate is also more curved or has more roundings if that is a better description. Of course the AX has the vertical ridges on the safety bars where the Sentinel bars are completely smooth.
IMG_5178.jpeg


Finally the cap is different with the AX being both thicker and having longer blade posts on the sides. Judging by the thickness of the cap at the upper part I would say this is the second version of the cap.

Summary of results





DateRazorBladeFacial Impact ScoreEffectiveness
17.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX7 O’Clock Yellow10.08.75
19.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX / Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow10.08.75
21.01.2025Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow10.09.00
23.01.2025Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow9.758.75
24.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX / Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow9.758.75

Notes

Purely based on results there is hardly any difference if there is a difference at all. The only thing I can spot is that I have to micro facial impacts and they were both on the Yaqi side. That said I believe the Yaqi is achieving the results in an easier and smoother / more comfortable fashion. I cannot put my finger on it entirely. Just a gut feel I guess. Both razors are amazing by the way. And whether or not they are good clones or not, they can stand their own as well. In the looks department the DSC wins without question. If the Sentinel had those ridges on the safety bars this razor head would have headed my way much sooner.

These razors are excellent for when you need a quick effective shave, because you are heading to the office or just need to go somewhere and want to look good. For me personally these could also be daily drivers despite their gap and effectiveness. My stubble usually is present in the morning to such extent I need to shave. I could not imagine skipping a day that’s for sure.

The AX has the advantage that it also comes in titanium and combined with a titanium handle that might be a winning razor for sure. Both AZ and Sentinel are also available as 1.35mm (although the AX has been sold out for quite some time now for anything other than the titanium 1.35mm. The Sentinel has the additional advantage that it is also available as open comb and as skeleton baseplate. The titanium AX version might also be the second version of the head making it easier to remove the blade.
 

Iridian

Cool and slimy
I just tried to describe the differences to @spacemonkey42. That's great timing @Guido75 !

I got a 1.35 Ti instead of the 1.55, they are sending the 1.55 now, though.

The SS versions are available again, I didn't ask if they already corrected the too tight clamping issue for them as well by now, though. No idea if they are finally the expected new batch, it seems likely, though.

I felt the AX to have less exposure, but then, I compare with the 1.35 gap atm.

I ordered the DSC "spiral" ti handle along with the 1.55 head, now I will have a complete DSC ti handle collection.

The latest three handles they released in particular are marvelous. One cannot go wrong with either handle, all very beautiful and well made.
 

Guido75

Is it swell time?
Nice! Looking forward to your review notes then!
The latest three handles they released in particular are marvelous. One cannot go wrong with either handle, all very beautiful and well made.
They certainly are. I have been eyeing those three new ones (what are they called again Rocket and Plane). They have them in stainless now as well. Very nice!

Cheers,

Guido
 

Iridian

Cool and slimy
I have been eyeing those three new ones (what are they called again Rocket and Plane). They have them in stainless now as well. Very nice!

Cheers,

Guido
Careful there, the SS ones might be particularly cheap for a reason, see the photos of quite significant milling marks they included.

Rocket, Plane/Planar and Thor are the names of the latest three, the "Spiral" is several months older.

I got the "Plane" last, it's a hexagonal handle but to my surprise I am getting along with it as well. It's also very grippy, even more so than the Thor.

They are not just looking good, the threads are clean, no black gunk as for some older handles from DSCI have , and they screw in perfectly fine. Also grippy, as you might remember I found the DSC handles to be on the over polished and slippery side, these don't have any issues. Highly recommended.
 
Another comparison of razors in my den in part made possible by Glenn @megamac.

This time a newcomer being the Wolfman WR2 clone AX and a semi sibling being the Yaqi Sentinel, a Wolfman inspired razor.

View attachment 1983308

DSCosmetics AX

I have read in various reviews that the AX is the closest clone / copy to the real WR2 - some state about 90% similar, but as far as my intelligence goes the blade exposure is nowhere near the one you have with a Wolfman with a 1.55 blade gap. The blade exposure on the real Wolfman is .40mm. I think James' take on the Tech-like WR2 is one of the most beautiful razor designs to hit the market. And just by looks this AX comes very close.

My AX (also known as Poleaxe) has a blade gap of 1.55mm and judging by the website the blade exposure is 0.06mm. This is by far the widest gap I have. The blade exposure is in my regular ball park. The razor has a wide angle to choose from and going shallow sort of neutralises the positive exposure.

The razor is all stainless steel. Three piece razor. The head weighs 35 grams and the handle I used (Razorock Barberpole) is 67 grams, so the entire razor in this comparison is about 101 grams. The blade clamping is extremely tight and is so tight that the blade is forced into position. This in itself is a good thing. However, the blade definitely needs help being released from the cap. That is fairly easy to do by the way, but it does require some effort.

The only real peeve I have with the razor is the threading on the cap. The Barberpole fits easily and smoothly whereas other handles lock at a certain point. What I really like is full blade coverage, so no side parts hanging out.

The shave is really smooth and comfortable. This can depend on the blade, but with that huge gap considering, the razor is extremely smooth. It communicates confidence to the user which is very helpful in using it. Very effective razor as well. Higher end blades, like Nacet or Gillette Platinum require some precautions, but overall it isn´t really blade picky.

Yaqi Sentinel 1.50SB

Like the AX, the Sentinel is an all stainless razor head. It also weighs 35 grams and I have fitted it with the same Barberpole handle. Blade gap is 1.50, so every so slightly less than the AX while the exposure seems to be on par. According to the website it is .05mm. The Sentinel is a very smooth shaver that feels extremely comfortable to the skin. Meanwhile it is equally effective and can bring a beard down without effort. And a proper blade of course.

View attachment 1983309
(Sentinel left, AX right)

View attachment 1983310

So they seem very very similar, but there are differences as well. The caps, for example, are not exchangeable as the width is different by 1mm or 2 mm. What I also think is that the Sentinel (mine at least) has been chromed, whereas the AX is polished stainless steel. The reason for my thinking is that the baseplate ring where the cap post goes through is recessed but in a way that reminds me of Zamak. See the baseplate for the AX and the post ring there is clearly CNC tight. Furthermore the AX has one lather slot on each side and the Sentinel has two.

View attachment 1983311
The Sentinel baseplate is also more curved or has more roundings if that is a better description. Of course the AX has the vertical ridges on the safety bars where the Sentinel bars are completely smooth.
View attachment 1983312

Finally the cap is different with the AX being both thicker and having longer blade posts on the sides. Judging by the thickness of the cap at the upper part I would say this is the second version of the cap.

Summary of results





DateRazorBladeFacial Impact ScoreEffectiveness
17.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX7 O’Clock Yellow10.08.75
19.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX / Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow10.08.75
21.01.2025Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow10.09.00
23.01.2025Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow9.758.75
24.01.2025DSC PoleAxe AX / Yaqi Sentinel7 O’Clock Yellow9.758.75

Notes

Purely based on results there is hardly any difference if there is a difference at all. The only thing I can spot is that I have to micro facial impacts and they were both on the Yaqi side. That said I believe the Yaqi is achieving the results in an easier and smoother / more comfortable fashion. I cannot put my finger on it entirely. Just a gut feel I guess. Both razors are amazing by the way. And whether or not they are good clones or not, they can stand their own as well. In the looks department the DSC wins without question. If the Sentinel had those ridges on the safety bars this razor head would have headed my way much sooner.

These razors are excellent for when you need a quick effective shave, because you are heading to the office or just need to go somewhere and want to look good. For me personally these could also be daily drivers despite their gap and effectiveness. My stubble usually is present in the morning to such extent I need to shave. I could not imagine skipping a day that’s for sure.

The AX has the advantage that it also comes in titanium and combined with a titanium handle that might be a winning razor for sure. Both AZ and Sentinel are also available as 1.35mm (although the AX has been sold out for quite some time now for anything other than the titanium 1.35mm. The Sentinel has the additional advantage that it is also available as open comb and as skeleton baseplate. The titanium AX version might also be the second version of the head making it easier to remove the blade.
Another superb comparison @Guido75. Totally loved it. I have used the AX 1.35 and 1.55 and am not a fan of the former. The 1.55 is just smoother and more efficient for me. As for the Sentinel, love both the AB and the OC in 1.50.
 
Excellent comparison and highly appreciate the stellar write up. My only comment is targeting Yaqi( maybe DS too), they seem to be using .05 mm for most of their heads. I personally prefer the design where when the gap increases incrementally , so does the blade exposure. This is done by a lot of smart cnc razor companies. Sure I get there is more to that, blade angle, clamping, etc..
But for me, that is where these companies/minds fail by just playing it safe.
So from my point of view…
a 1.55 gap with a .05 or even .06 mm exposure does not make sense to me. Sure it could be good for big *** stubble removal.
Yes it is a safe design for the masses….
But again, for a good design their should incorporate a good balanced symbiotic relationship with the metal used,
head, cap, blade gap, angle …


YMMV
or
YOMV
Your Opinion My Vary

Ultimately, as long as their is happiest in the holder of the tool…
I am happy for them…


BFX
 

Guido75

Is it swell time?
I personally prefer the design where when the gap increases incrementally , so does the blade exposure.
I can understand that. Wolfman does at least. The relatively low exposure fit my sense of comfort. But then again my Greencult 1 with .95mm gap and .25mm exposure handles very nicely as well.
But again, for a good design their should incorporate a good balanced symbiotic relationship with the metal used
Atelier Durdan on the other hand keeps exposure exactly the same no matter the gap.
Many think that their exposure specs are not accurate. They seem to list the same for most.
Yeah, DSC lists approximately .06mm. How can it be approximately when the razor is CNC-ed, right?!
 
I had the original version AX 1.55 about two years ago and sent it back to Aliexpress as the blade got stuck between the end posts and in a bent position. I was afraid to shave with it. When I saw the similar head from Yaqi (Sentinel 1.55) I bought it immediately along with two of the new Dscosmetic ti handles (not the Thor). Great shaving razor smooth and close.
 

Guido75

Is it swell time?
Now I want one. The DSCosmetics head looks like a winner. Any advice to which one I should get? I currently use a GC68-P and 84-P
I have the GC .84-P both SB and OC. If you are ok with that one the 1.55SB is also very doable. I would have to do a side by side to be more sure.

But if I recall from your SOTD posts is that you seem to prefer the .68 - is that correct?
 
I have the GC .84-P both SB and OC. If you are ok with that one the 1.55SB is also very doable. I would have to do a side by side to be more sure.

But if I recall from your SOTD posts is that you seem to prefer the .68 - is that correct?
Yeah, the .68-P is my smooth sailing daily driver.
 

Guido75

Is it swell time?
Yeah, the .68-P is my smooth sailing daily driver.
I have no bearing to verify my statement, but I can imagine the 1.35mm to be a match then. There is one reservation about that. I believe the positive exposure is the same for the 1.35 and the 1.50 which might actually make the 1.35 more aggressive in feel.

I don’t have the .68 unfortunately, but I do have a Greencult 2 with .65 gap and .10 exposure (which is more exposure than the GC I think). That feels more effective/aggressive than the AX does.
 
I have no bearing to verify my statement, but I can imagine the 1.35mm to be a match then. There is one reservation about that. I believe the positive exposure is the same for the 1.35 and the 1.50 which might actually make the 1.35 more aggressive in feel.

I don’t have the .68 unfortunately, but I do have a Greencult 2 with .65 gap and .10 exposure (which is more exposure than the GC I think). That feels more effective/aggressive than the AX does.
Thank you kindly for your input, I greatly appreciate it!!!
 

Ron R

I survived a lathey foreman
The Sentinel is a very smooth shaver that feels extremely comfortable to the skin. Meanwhile it is equally effective and can bring a beard down without effort. And a proper blade of course.
Same experiences with my Sentinel 1.50 as what you concluded. Yaqi never put serrations on the safety bar and maybe it was the way they designed it to shave with a shallow angle(riding the cap) works the best for myself and most of the time my shaves are DFS++ has been my results.
Tried to shave riding the bar and it does not shave as good, it is a smooth shaver riding the cap and a few other fellows guided me with their suggestions from using the Sentinel conclusions also to ride the cap.
 

Iridian

Cool and slimy
In this regard I see similarities to my beloved Timeless Slim.

I am not going steep on the very first pass. It would be rough.

But once most of the hair is gone, my ATG cleanup is very steep for both razors. (Slim and Sentinel).

This makes me often wonder if people really try hard to hold a certain angle rather than letting the razor guide them. 🤔

The AX head can go steep much earlier and more comfortable. I think the lower exposure is the reason.

(I am still at home. Flu is almost gone but did a number on me I wouldn't have expected AFTER corona is more or less officially over. 🤪

Maybe I should try killing remaining viruses in my throat by drowning them with Cognac!)
 
Top Bottom