We all know and use the LOL acronym for "laughing out loud." Languages evolve, and uses for words change with time also. I think I am seeing an evolution of the use of LOL.
Initially, when I saw LOL used, it very clearly from context meant the writer was amused a lot. Not just amused, but laughing out loud amused. Increasingly, I see LOL used more like a smiley indicating a positive reaction and not necessarily amusement.
"I think your honing was good, but the shaving edge could have been improved by use of more stropping. lol."
The writer wasn't amused by anything, especially since it was written in response to anything (in my example.) Rather, it seems to ensure the reader understands his tone, his "smiley" tone.
Have I imagined that LOL usage is changing?
As an aside, I am not en etymological Nazi about to pounce on someone who doesn't use a word or acronym correctly. I just find this fascinating.
Initially, when I saw LOL used, it very clearly from context meant the writer was amused a lot. Not just amused, but laughing out loud amused. Increasingly, I see LOL used more like a smiley indicating a positive reaction and not necessarily amusement.
"I think your honing was good, but the shaving edge could have been improved by use of more stropping. lol."
The writer wasn't amused by anything, especially since it was written in response to anything (in my example.) Rather, it seems to ensure the reader understands his tone, his "smiley" tone.
Have I imagined that LOL usage is changing?
As an aside, I am not en etymological Nazi about to pounce on someone who doesn't use a word or acronym correctly. I just find this fascinating.