Opinions on Suunto watches?

[Teflon_Synapses]

Hey guys,

Im looking into picking up a Suunto watch. Im currently looking at the Core and the X Lander Military. I have done some research, but felt I needed the opinions of the fine gentleman here.

Does one have a major benefit over the other?

How do the leather straps on the core look in person?

Does anyone have a picture of ether on their wirst?

Im looking to find out as much as possible about these watches. I appreciate the help.


Thanks,

Josh

 

[Kazeryu]

Every time I've seen a picture of someone wearing one, it looked hilariously oversized. Like a clown watch.

But people do seem to like them, so they must be doing something right.

 

[Jussi]

Coming from a Finn (Suunto is a Finnish company): Suunto is a heartbeat monitor / training computer manufacturer. It's OK to wear one when training, but utterly, disgustingly ridiculous to wear it as a watch.

Need a training computer? Get Suunto. They do the job nicely.

Need a watch? Buy a watch. Mechanical one.

 

[Kazeryu]

Someone posted pics of two Suunto's here.

 

[Cartier]

The only people I have seen put Suunto watches to actual use are US SOF. Otherwise it seems like a bit of over kill.

YMMV.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

 

[Austin]

I like Suunto very much. It is on my buy list. I have not gotten around to buy it yet. I owned a core before and sold it here. Here is a picture of it.

 

[KW Driver]

I got a Vector to replace a G-shock that was one of the early auto updating/solar models. I'd run G-Shocks for 18 yrs prior. the Vector? look at it hard and the plastic face scratches itself. the altimeter and barometer are worthless, and I've never used the compass. and it felt ridiculously big. Core or X-Lander? no, I'll never buy one.

my next "field watch", to replace the Vector, will most likely be a Timex Ironman.

that's just me, do your thing.

 

[Teflon_Synapses]

Im looking at a Suunto for trail ridding and hiking primarily... just to clarify.

 

[petr]

I love the idea of one for hiking and hunting deep in the woods. I've wanted one for a while.

 

[Larry C in Texas]

I've got an X-Lander (positive face) and I like the big size and big numerals (no pics with me, sorry). I don't wear it all that much and have thought about selling it, but when I do wear it I like it. The case is aluminum with a carbon fiber back, so it's very lightweight. I occasionally use the compass when I'm riding my bike. The barometer is only useful when the watch is off your wrist, as your body temp impacts it. So, that's not a good point. The X-Lander is made in Finland, while the Core is made in China, if that is a factor. The Core is a newer design with more features, but I wanted one made in Finland, which is why I went with X-Lander. The technology is proven and I have not had any issues with mine in 3+ years.

Don't listen to those deriding them as clown watches. If you like them and would use the features, go for it. I think mechanical watches are not worth the money and are outdated (and I have owned over 25 of them in my life before I tired of them), but I don't deride those who wear them. To each their own.

YMMV, of course.

 

[Austin]

Don't listen to those deriding them as clown watches. If you like them and would use the features, go for it. I think mechanical watches are not worth the money and are outdated (and I have owned over 25 of them in my life before I tired of them), but I don't deride those who wear them. To each their own.

YMMV, of course.

Agreed. These watches actually stand out. I notice them on folks more than I notice other watches.

 

[Austin]

I forgot to mention my son had two watches in Iraq. One was a Gshock and the other was his Suunto. He beat both watches up but they lasted his tour.

 

[Nomad1600]

I have a black/yellow Core that I pre-purchased when they first announced. The battery died and I tried replacing but it dies again soon after. I first liked the looks and functionality but didn't really get much use of the watch and it soon just sat in my watch case. If I was seriously into outdoor adventure (eg climbing, MTBing) that benefited from the altitude info I'd recommend it more highly... there are other watches I like better as a timepiece however. G-Shocks, for example, seem really bulletproof and a lot more affordable.

 

[Larry C in Texas]

Could you please thank your son for his service, from me? Also, thank you for raising him in a manner that he understands the importance of stepping up and fighting for the freedoms we enjoy and too often take for granted. My hats off to both of you!!!

I forgot to mention my son had two watches in Iraq. One was a Gshock and the other was his Suunto. He beat both watches up but they lasted his tour.

 

[Jussi]

Don't listen to those deriding them as clown watches. If you like them and would use the features, go for it. I think mechanical watches are not worth the money and are outdated (and I have owned over 25 of them in my life before I tired of them), but I don't deride those who wear them. To each their own.

YMMV, of course.

Electric shaver, perhaps?

 

[Larry C in Texas]

Yes sir, on occasion. For me, as a nearly 60 year old semi-retired guy, it's all about convenience. When I need to go somewhere and need a shave, and I don't have time to whip up a bowl of lather, I pull out the Braun. On other occasions, I enjoy wet shaving. On the watch front, I understand the attraction to mechanical/automatic watches. They are a marvel of mechanical engineering with all the gears and springs. At one time, that was all I would have in my collection. But, for me, they are just too needy - you either have to wear them, wind them, or keep them on a winder. As I get older, I want less to have to take care, not more and automatic watches were not worth it for me. I'm glad they are still popular - I would hate to see them die out as they are a huge part of our history. Just not for me. Sorry for hijacking the thread. Now, back to your regularly scheduled Suunto discussion.

Electric shaver, perhaps?