- Thread starter
- #1,901
Another trip to the gym last night, along with being under m goal again yesterday. Good news on both!
Another trip to the gym last night, along with being under m goal again yesterday. Good news on both!
Another trip to the gym last night, along with being under m goal again yesterday. Good news on both!
What is worse for you splenda or sugar?
Oh boy, did you just open a can of worms. You'll get another 2000 posts on the merits/evils of low-cal sweeteners and artificial foods.
I have no science to share with you, just personal experience. I use Splenda primarily in my coffee because I'm too weeny to drink it black (also Coffee Mate powder). I don't cook with it. I've tried it a couple times, and it's just kind of meh.
I think this fits into the "Everything in moderation" category. Sugar is a biological compound that man has been consuming for thousands of years in some form or another. However, it packs a fair number of calories and for some (like me) just wants them want more and more. Splenda is some sort of sugar derivative that is extremely low-cal. Not natural, but not likely to be harmful in usual quantities either. Use it as a tool if you find it helpful. YMMV.
+1, artificial sweeteners are the most studied food additive ever and they are not an issue. Sugar is also not an issue if you keep it within reason and it fits into a healthy diet. If you don't want the calories then use the artificial sweeteners.
Except for the recent articles that artificial sweeteners cause havoc with your gut biome and may accelerate diabetes.....
I just discovered this amazing thread. I like to joke with Mr. Kevdogg on the restraint threads, but I never knew of your struggle before.
13, no 14 years since I threw drink and drugs off the cliff. No AA - not a 12-step fan, but I did daily cognitive behavior therapy for six months.
There is success for you, Mr. Kevdogg. Long trail, but you have people you don't even now thinking the best for you.
What is worse for you splenda or sugar?