- Thread starter
- #41
Dilbone I’d like to propose the following:
You shouldn’t necessarily be able to shave well off any Coticule...
Not being able to shave off any random Coticule shouldn’t be a metric by which anyone’s honing should be measured. I’m sorry but someone needs to say it. There’s too much variance from stone to stone for anyone to suggest that any Coticule edge would be just like another.
What I’ve done is put my Coticules in sort of a progression so I get the best of each.
As for your jnat? Again, if you can’t shave off it then stick it somewhere else in a sequence.
I’m not trying to sound judgmental but I feel that many in the honing world are buying let’s say 3 stones in an attempt to find the Blarney Sone! I would suggest that rather than looking for an ultimate finisher we should consider using troublesome stones in a different way. They will most likely serve you quite well in fact but just at a different stage. Even my “best” Coticule struggles to shave well after a 5k. But if I follow that 5k with my #7 bout, my #8 Dressante bout, & then my unmarked 130X70mm the razor shaves great. I find it fascinating how well these 3 stones play together. But when I had originally bought these I was hoping that each would have been “the stone”. But these stones in the right sequence produce a uniqueness that a single stone may or may not be able to offer.
Thanks lightfoot. I think you hit the nail on the head for what I'm discovering right now.