Back before my beard grew in quicker I would shave every other day and a cartridge would last me at least a month.
We should all put this to the test and YouTube it. Start pushing back on this crap. Have to think of a title. "One month Gillette Fusion test" or something. Given that we now know how to shave this would be a fair group to test something like this. Anyone up for Gillette challenge?
I saw this too. I think I said something like "what!? a year supply?! 1 cartridge per month?!" then I laughed uncontrollably and walked away.
If Gillette is responding to market pressures by conceding that people only need to replace the cartridges once a month, as opposed to once a week, I cannot imagine they would invest additional R&D to design cartridges specifically for that purpose. I have no doubt this is purely a change in marketing, and that the product itself has not changed as a result of the change in rhetoric.Did anybody else notice that in the video posted earlier in this thread Gillette was not talking about close or good shaves but only comfortable shaves. Maybe they are engineering the blades to be comfortable for a month by moving them a little farther away from the skin and therefore sacrificing shave quality. They certainly don't talk about the quality of the shave.
If Gillette is responding to market pressures by conceding that people only need to replace the cartridges once a month, as opposed to once a week, I cannot imagine they would invest additional R&D to design cartridges specifically for that purpose.
Gillette is not raising the price of the Fusion, and at the same time is mounting a marketing campaign designed to convince customers to buy fewer replacement cartridges over a given period of time.* As such, they're conceding a loss in sales volume, presumably to stave off a greater loss resulting from customer defection to other brands or models due to perceived poor value. Given that, it does not make sense that they would invest more R&D dollars, thereby reducing profit margins as well.Why not?
Were a year's supply of batteries for the Fusion vibrator handle included?
Of all the innovations Gillette has foisted upon us, the vibrator handle takes the cake!
Why not? I am sure they can make blades that keep an edge for weeks. Given their profit margins, there likely is room to use the best steels in producing the Fusion blades, and still make lots of money.
Actually it would be a clever strategy ... our cartridges are expensive, but last double as long as the competition.
Really now, just how many men in the US only need to shave four times a week.
yup. I'd like to know this as well. I think it would just annoy me.I never understood the concept of the vibrating cartridge razor. What does shaking it contribute?
I also saw a commercial for a Norelco electric where the shaver used lather. That's another head scratcher.
I can do that, no problem. However, I think it should go a step further and compare it to other razors based on the number of shaves per $. Sure, I can get 16 shaves out of a Fusion. How does the 16th shave from a Fusion compare to the eighth shave from a Quattro? For the price of a Fusion cartridge, I could by enough Personna disposables or Astra DE blades to use a new one for every pass...We should all put this to the test and YouTube it. Start pushing back on this crap. Have to think of a title. "One month Gillette Fusion test" or something. Given that we now know how to shave this would be a fair group to test something like this. Anyone up for Gillette challenge?
If Fusions are so bad, why do people keep buying them then??