not to worry.My only real fear, is what if the new guy performs better than the old?!
not to worry.My only real fear, is what if the new guy performs better than the old?!
So? They're were making Techs with plastic handles for India and SE Asia like for ages. Even now.
No, can't say I have. I wanted to, especially considering they can be had on eBay for about from three to five bucks, but from what I've seen I'll have more chances for a good shave with some Chinese rasors.Have you used one of those Tech knock offs? Most of them are more aggressive and often not well made. Not that some of them aren't a decent quality, especially for the price, but I would go for a quality made razor over one of them any day.
I'm wondering how their ad campaign would run?
after decades of trying to convince the world that
"more blades means a better, smoother, faster shave"
well, what do they say now when they go back to a one-blade razor,
and a non-disposable one at that?
No, can't say I have. I wanted to, especially considering they can be had on eBay for about from three to five bucks, but from what I've seen I'll have more chances for a good shave with some Chinese rasors.
There is nothing like a marketing spin to keep you firmly in two minds at one time like The Ministry of Truth. There is much value in resurrecting old products since markets have memory and it's obvious that a large percentage of the wet shaving community really likes the vintage Gillette hardware. I can see this being a very limited and targeted marketing campaign that most in the general public probably won't even notice. On a side note, I've seen one company that sells subscriptions for DE razors as an alternative for those who are prone to razor rash and bumps. This might be an angle for Gillette but we'll have to see what it looks like if and when it comes out.
Yes, Egypt-made Lord razors are pretty decent for what they cost. Your brother got one with the metal handle, right?I would only consider the Rei Mei (spelling). My brother got one of those and it was a serviceable razor, more aggressive but not bad, but it broke after a few months. He then got a Lord branded, Tech knock off and it seems to be a better razor in terms of both shave and durability.
.Actually in 1920, the last full year of their patent protection, they only made about $600,000. After they stopped the high priced razor model their profits exploded to $18 million by 1925. This change was forced on them by their competitors and they would not have survived without it.
Guess you missed it..post 198OMG, No ... if there's one thing the wet-shaving world doesn't need right now is another subscription plan.
I mean, its a viable business model, and might just make P&G some profit(s), but puh-leez count me out.
I still haven't heard a price-point on this repro-Tech ... anybody care to venture a guess?
OMG, No ... if there's one thing the wet-shaving world doesn't need right now is another subscription plan.
I mean, its a viable business model, and might just make P&G some profit(s), but puh-leez count me out.
I still haven't heard a price-point on this repro-Tech ... anybody care to venture a guess?
Even at fifty bucks, I don't know? I mean I do want to get one when and if it does come out, but at fifty bucks it's at the equivalent of six of my razors now. But, it is Gillette right? If they screw with the blade thing, like use purpose built blades, I'm certainly out.
Even at fifty bucks, I don't know? I mean I do want to get one when and if it does come out, but at fifty bucks it's at the equivalent of six of my razors now. But, it is Gillette right? If they screw with the blade thing, like use purpose built blades, I'm certainly out.
My hope is that the production of the new razor will lower the demand for (and price of) vintage razors. "Why buy old when you can buy new?"
I think it will be made in India. ..If it is released through AoS, it will be pricey.
If it is well made and preferably made in the US, or Europe, it may itself become a collector's item. They will sell tens of thousands of them just for the novelty. (but not if a cheap Asian knock-off).
Were I advising, I'd actually suggest that they not even make a copy of a vintage razor. Come up with a novel design to make it valued in its own right. (Especially if in the $75 > $100 or... dare I say it? $200 range).
No it will not affect the vintage market. When I look at the investments that some make in what is basically an old stained rusted razor, (the Adventures of Rust Boy quickly come to mind), I see a totally different kind of desire that fuels that activity. It is the same love that goes into rescuing a gas guzzling '57 Chevy from the scrap heap. There is a desire to shave AS in days of old, not just LIKE days of old.
If they are attempting a release, it should be something novel, and something elegant. It should be made of stainless or at least plated brass and stand on its own as a collectable. They will charge too much for a mere curiosity.