I know that the X stroke is the general way of honing. There are a few things I don't understand about it. They say the reasoning for using the X stroke is because of discrepancies in the hone and razor and so the whole razor gets attention. But if the hone is lapped correctly and the razor is laid completely flat and if the water displacement is good when razor goes across it, couldn't an up/down stroke be used correctly? My razor covers the whole stone. Also, when I strop I use both the up/down and X stroke. It seems like I can keep the blade against the bench strop better using the up/down. It just feels more comfortable to me. I'm assuming I will have the same comfort feeling with the hone. Has anyone ever achieved the proper edge using the up/down method on the hone?
Update: I no longer need answers for the above question, just this one
The overwhelming information I've read suggest the X stroke is the way to go. I have no problem doing what is best, I just want to understand it better. But my one question that still remains about the X stroke is the amount of time the blade spends on the stone. With the up/down stroke, the whole blade is always on the stone. But with the X stroke, the heel leaves the stone half way but the toe stays on all the time. How does the heel get sufficient honing if it leaves half way?
Update: I no longer need answers for the above question, just this one
The overwhelming information I've read suggest the X stroke is the way to go. I have no problem doing what is best, I just want to understand it better. But my one question that still remains about the X stroke is the amount of time the blade spends on the stone. With the up/down stroke, the whole blade is always on the stone. But with the X stroke, the heel leaves the stone half way but the toe stays on all the time. How does the heel get sufficient honing if it leaves half way?
Last edited: