Earlier this year I ordered a Thater 4125 with an octagonal handle. I expected the Thater logo on the side, but when the brush arrived it was on the botton. I have no problem with the logo on the bottom. The Shavemac 173 handle, which is also octagonal, has the logo engraved on the bottom. However, Thater is not printing or engraving its logo on the bottom. Rather, it has glued a plastic disc on the bottom of the handle. The plastic disc is black, but the top of it is painted silver. When the lettering tools are pressed against this plastic disc, the result is black lettering against a silver background. It looks like this:
Others may like this but I find it ugly and cheap looking. I took this picture the moment I took out the brush from the box. If you look below and to the left of the 4125, you will see a spot where the silver paint had already flaked off on the new brush.
I can't think of why Thater would do this. It's a beautiful, high end brush that does not deserve such a low end logo.
I'm curious as to how others feel about this.
Others may like this but I find it ugly and cheap looking. I took this picture the moment I took out the brush from the box. If you look below and to the left of the 4125, you will see a spot where the silver paint had already flaked off on the new brush.
I can't think of why Thater would do this. It's a beautiful, high end brush that does not deserve such a low end logo.
I'm curious as to how others feel about this.
Last edited: