The term "vest pocket" implied that a thing was compact for easy portability, such as for inclusion in a travel kit, in your car's glove compartment, or in a desk drawer at the office.
The term "vest pocket" implied that a thing was compact for easy portability, such as for inclusion in a travel kit, in your car's glove compartment, or in a desk drawer at the office.
Yes, but what made this convenience necessary? Perhaps we have been equipment .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'll take one of each!Bingo.
The only ad that I could find with google that specifically shows a travel set is this one, dated December 10, 1958.
(What to get the guy that already has 89 aftershaves in novelty decanters.)
However, the razor itself does not seem to be any smaller than usual.
Required kit if you want to be this cool...
Why does anyone want something to be smaller to carry or pack? Because it is convenient. You answer your own question.
I doubt that’s the reason. The topic is vest pocket, not travel razor. I suspect men carried vest pocket razors to take touch up a poor shave .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'll take one of each!
The adjustable in 1958 was probably the one we call the Fatboy, right? The gold-plated was the Aristocrat?
The "inc. P.T." referred to the then-current term for sales tax, I guess -- "Purchase Tax"?
It was pure marketing. As Buick wrote, Gillette targeted men shaving at home. Then they developed an even smaller razor so men shaving at home could also shave during travel, vacation, etc.
Gillette always had to come up with something (seemingly) new and the vest pocket was the smallest that could be offered and was way cheaper to produce than pocket editions.
It's interesting that there were no vest pocket models with NEW or New improved heads, not counting the lady razors.
Adam