Sodium tallowate, potassium stearate, potassium palmitate, sodium cocoate, ptoassium cocoate, water, glycerine, fragrance, titanium dioxide, sodium chloride, o-tolyl biguanide, trisodium hedta.
http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/ingredient.php?ingred06=704173¬hanks=1O-TOLYL BIGUANIDE
One or more animal studies show brain and nervous system effects at low doses
One or more animal studies show sense organ effects at very low doses
They list it as a low hazard. I'm not worried, but I think that wouldn't be a big selling point.
I'm unfamiliar with 'o-tolyl biguanide'. Maybe someone else has personal knowledge of this ingredient.
Reading further on the website (noted in previous post) it further states that neurotoxicity is to [the ingredient itself] not when it's contained in a product.
i.e.... I wouldn't recommend anyone eat a cup of pure baking cocoa but is sure makes a good chocolate cake when it's part of the ingredients.
Sue
Very interesting. This is what's listed as the ingredients on the puck of vintage Old Spice shaving soap that I recently coughed up for.
Is there anything on the list that stands out as a "they just don't do that anymore" kind of ingredient?
I'm unfamiliar with 'o-tolyl biguanide'. Maybe someone else has personal knowledge of this ingredient.
trisodium hedta.
I'm not really sure. I've often wondered at the noticably different ingredient lists for products like VDH and SCS; and when I saw Mantic's videos on method shaving where pure olive oil soap is 'primed', 'lubricated', 'luxurioused', and what not my first response was: why not put everything in one simple, ready-to-use puck or tube...?? The reasons could be economical, historical, or even simple logistics of the manufacturing process. Consider: The USA is, compared to most other countries, a huge chunk of land, and that means that a manufacturer wishing to deliver nation-wide probably takes too much risks by using just a single production facility. Not to mention additional shipment costs and the logistics of timely delivery. So it would make sense to use multiple 'local' production facilities. But if ingredients with strict quality control tolerances are specified for the recipe, the local sites must be made too complex again. So one would tend to develop simple recipes using synthetic intermediates whose purity levels and the like are much easier to keep an eye on.I guess the question becomes, if it's a "pure and simple soap", why there isn't something like it on the shelves here in the USA?
Consider: The USA is, compared to most other countries, a huge chunk of land, and that means that a manufacturer wishing to deliver nation-wide probably takes too much risks by using just a single production facility. Not to mention additional shipment costs and the logistics of timely delivery. So it would make sense to use multiple 'local' production facilities.
I stand corrected. That said, it was merely thinking out loud about what I, as inhabitant of a small country, would consider an 'obvious' reason. Still, it's an impressive achievement to have goods move about so quickly.