This isn't a dig - I need to say up front that I am getting nice shaves with this soap - but the overall characteristics of it are like nothing else I have used and I wondered what other folks' opinions of this soap have been.
When I tip off the bloom water and rub it on my face it has NO slickness at all. Zip. Nil. Nada. That is pretty much unique for me in 15 years of using different soaps, and some artisan soaps offer so much slickness just from the bloom water that I feel as though I don't even need to make a lather to shave. However, lathering the Wickhams does make an incredibly dense and creamy lather the like of which I also haven't seen elsewhere. Even when loaded with water, the lather is thick and it seems to do a good job of protecting during the shave, providing ENOUGH lubrication for an open blade shave whilst allowing plenty of feedback. Between the fingers, the lather feels kind of like a liquid soap. That's how dense it is. However, once the lather is removed by the blade, there is almost no residual slickness to speak of.
I can't dispute that the results I get with this soap are very nice and my skin certainly likes it, but the overall properties of the lather seem really odd. Has anyone else had a similar experience with this or another artisan soap? We have all used soaps that might be subpar in slickness, but I have never used one that seems to have so little inherent slickness but can still deliver the goods when it comes to the shave.
I am wondering if the ingredients list can explain this: Potassium Stearate, Aqua, Sodium Cocoate, Sodium Cocoa Butterate, Sodium Palmate, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Sodium Avocadate, White Kaolin, Allantoin, Glycerine.
Could the Kaolin or Allantoin be a factor? I am not sure how these ingredients contribute to the performance and I am wondering if this particular batch got an overdose of something that is counteracting the slickness somehow.
When I tip off the bloom water and rub it on my face it has NO slickness at all. Zip. Nil. Nada. That is pretty much unique for me in 15 years of using different soaps, and some artisan soaps offer so much slickness just from the bloom water that I feel as though I don't even need to make a lather to shave. However, lathering the Wickhams does make an incredibly dense and creamy lather the like of which I also haven't seen elsewhere. Even when loaded with water, the lather is thick and it seems to do a good job of protecting during the shave, providing ENOUGH lubrication for an open blade shave whilst allowing plenty of feedback. Between the fingers, the lather feels kind of like a liquid soap. That's how dense it is. However, once the lather is removed by the blade, there is almost no residual slickness to speak of.
I can't dispute that the results I get with this soap are very nice and my skin certainly likes it, but the overall properties of the lather seem really odd. Has anyone else had a similar experience with this or another artisan soap? We have all used soaps that might be subpar in slickness, but I have never used one that seems to have so little inherent slickness but can still deliver the goods when it comes to the shave.
I am wondering if the ingredients list can explain this: Potassium Stearate, Aqua, Sodium Cocoate, Sodium Cocoa Butterate, Sodium Palmate, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Sodium Avocadate, White Kaolin, Allantoin, Glycerine.
Could the Kaolin or Allantoin be a factor? I am not sure how these ingredients contribute to the performance and I am wondering if this particular batch got an overdose of something that is counteracting the slickness somehow.