What has become of the music industry? What will today's kids be listening in 10, 20 or even 30 years?
I know this will be viewed by some as just an old guy stuck in the past and unwilling to keep up with the current trends of music. That's partially true.
However, the music business in and of itself has changed so drastically that I don't think kids today really have a chance to "grow up" with the music of their generation as my generation did with the music of their times.
IMO, today's music is so disposable. 20 years from now will the 12-17 year old of today be listening to Lady Gaga?
Because of the Ipod/digital music age, the days of getting together with friends and listening to a new "album" and going through the liner notes or looking at the album art and listening to an artist's music mature album by album is different today. I wouldn't say it's gone. But certainly different.
I'm not talking about technological/audio advances since the LP/turntable days (although I am sure some of the audiophiles around here would beg to differ) but rather the opportunity to 'grow-up" with a band or group.
Because of the nature of today's music business, the attention span given to so many artists is brief at best. Sure, there are some who have staying power, but for the most part, a current recording artist is around for maybe 2 to 3 years (if they are lucky). I know there are exceptions, but overall, I think it is the norm. The kid who bought a 45 rpm of "Satisfaction" in 1965 could listen to the Rolling Stones for the next 16 years and still find them creative and relevant to the times (Tattoo You was released in 1981.) Certainly, the Stones are an exception as well.
How many bands/artists since 2000 have been recording for 10 years and are still relevant/popular? Sure there are some.
Look at the half-time shows of the Super Bowl for the last several years.
McCartney, The Rolling Stones, Springsteen, The Who. I know demographics plays a large part in their selection. But look at how many demographic sets these artists have transcended over the span of their respective careers.
I guess through it all, I feel that with the current state of music, that today's generation of music listeners is missing out on the organic experience of "growing-up" with the music/musicians of their time. And for that I am sorry because it was truly a great listening experience.
And of course the obligatory: YMMV.
You get the idea.
I know this will be viewed by some as just an old guy stuck in the past and unwilling to keep up with the current trends of music. That's partially true.
However, the music business in and of itself has changed so drastically that I don't think kids today really have a chance to "grow up" with the music of their generation as my generation did with the music of their times.
IMO, today's music is so disposable. 20 years from now will the 12-17 year old of today be listening to Lady Gaga?
Because of the Ipod/digital music age, the days of getting together with friends and listening to a new "album" and going through the liner notes or looking at the album art and listening to an artist's music mature album by album is different today. I wouldn't say it's gone. But certainly different.
I'm not talking about technological/audio advances since the LP/turntable days (although I am sure some of the audiophiles around here would beg to differ) but rather the opportunity to 'grow-up" with a band or group.
Because of the nature of today's music business, the attention span given to so many artists is brief at best. Sure, there are some who have staying power, but for the most part, a current recording artist is around for maybe 2 to 3 years (if they are lucky). I know there are exceptions, but overall, I think it is the norm. The kid who bought a 45 rpm of "Satisfaction" in 1965 could listen to the Rolling Stones for the next 16 years and still find them creative and relevant to the times (Tattoo You was released in 1981.) Certainly, the Stones are an exception as well.
How many bands/artists since 2000 have been recording for 10 years and are still relevant/popular? Sure there are some.
Look at the half-time shows of the Super Bowl for the last several years.
McCartney, The Rolling Stones, Springsteen, The Who. I know demographics plays a large part in their selection. But look at how many demographic sets these artists have transcended over the span of their respective careers.
I guess through it all, I feel that with the current state of music, that today's generation of music listeners is missing out on the organic experience of "growing-up" with the music/musicians of their time. And for that I am sorry because it was truly a great listening experience.
And of course the obligatory: YMMV.
1963-1970
1964-2005
1972-2009
You get the idea.
Last edited by a moderator: