I have delayed in getting the Supply Company or Parker injectors. What'syour feedback? Are they worth getting?
I agree with this evaluation of the Parker. Used it today and the 13th use of the Schick blades. Comfortable DFS shave.I have both and I like them both. My Parker is the first version, which is a bit milder than the newest model. I recommend you start with the Parker. It has similar mechanics to the Schick M and the styling of the Pal. Mine shaves great, albeit at the highest setting. I am told that the newer ones have a bit more range, but still not that of a Schick M.
You've got it just right. I have a Schick M1 and a Parker v2. The v2 adds a little more to the highest setting from what I'm told but the Shick M1 feels much more efficient on its higher settings. I'm happy with both of them in the middle, Parker on 3 and Schick on 5. I haven't needed to turn them up higher. I suppose if I had many days of growth I would.I have both and I like them both. My Parker is the first version, which is a bit milder than the newest model. I recommend you start with the Parker. It has similar mechanics to the Schick M and the styling of the Pal. Mine shaves great, albeit at the highest setting. I am told that the newer ones have a bit more range, but still not that of a Schick M.
I was actually surprised that the Schick M1 has a more substantial feel than the Parker. It's not a huge difference but it's noticeable. They are a bit smaller than I expected as well but fit my hand well and are comfortable to use. You make an interesting point about the Supply being much heavier by comparison.Most injectors are on the light side as weight is concerned. The Supply is on the hefty side and that takes some adjustment by the user. The Parker is more "Schick-like".
The OP is an experienced collector whom I believe has a number of vintage Schicks. I know of a few L types for sure.I've had all the historic Schicks, a couple PAL Injectors, and the Supply. They are worth trying, if I were the OP I'd opt for a vintage Schick to see if they enjoy the shave an injector provides. I like them because on my mug the injector blade is the narrowest & most nimble, and thus works better around the Adam's apple etc. Bear in mind that blade choices are limited compared to the number of DE's presently available.
If the vintage Schick suits the Supply is a step up in weight and durability, though the latter is mooted to some extent by the continued survival of 80+ year old Type E's ..
Guess I misread the question. I'd heartily recommend the Supply, haven't been tempted by a Parker so I can't contrast.The OP is an experienced collector whom I believe has a number of vintage Schicks. I know of a few L types for sure.
What do you think about Supply? What's your opinion?Guess I misread the question. I'd heartily recommend the Supply, haven't been tempted by a Parker so I can't contrast.
As said, I'd recommend it. Someone has already pointed out that it is seriously heavier than the older Schicks (save the Magazine Repeaters) and made of solid stainless. While I still have too many Schick format razors around, the two I use regularly are the Supply and my all time favorite the Type M Adjustable. The Supply is reasonably priced ($75) compared to modern SS DE's, and opens up completely for those that feel the need to scour the inside. The Personna blades it is furnished with aren't my favorite, and I preferred their version 1 which allowed you to pick one degree of aggression rather than paying for all three plates.What do you think about Supply? What's your opinion?
I wil probably get both. I will watch the BST's for an unwanted SS Supply and will get the Parker new. I may consider the alloy version of the Supply, so that would also be a new purchase. I have been good at resisting the launch of modern razors lol.So @Sabre what are your thoughts?
The only way to go for a true B&B'er!I wil probably get both
Same here, just backed the Pro adjustable!I had to back them for the adjustable razor. No self control!