Just came in today. On the menu for tonight’s shave.
I really would appreciate a side by side shave between the two OCs done by you, in the future...... then perhaps do a straight up head to head with the .95 OC to get real time feel and fresh data in my mind.
I really would appreciate a side by side shave between the two OCs done by you, in the future...
Cheers!
I had been shaving the last few weeks almost exclusively with the .95OC before I got my .72OC. I had one shave with the GC .84SB before the .72OC. The GC felt clunky compared to the .95OC. But when I used the .72OC, I was blown away. It's as smooth as the .95OC but way way way more forgiving, and even more forgiving than the GC. And as most GC.84SB users know, the GC is an easy razor to use. I think the GC shaves best at a steepish angle but with the LupoOC I tend to ride the smoothness ... if that makes sense. I haven't mentioned the efficiency. The .72OC is definitely more efficient than the GC. And while not as efficient as the .95SB/OC, and as @GlazedBoker intimates, it's more efficient than the shaver realizes--and yet with a very forgiving demeanor. The .72OC efficiency is knocking on the door of the .95.I really would appreciate a side by side shave between the two OCs done by you, in the future...
Cheers!
I am going to get a couple more shaves in with my new Green Cult 2.0 before I return to my Lupo testing. The 72OC for a complete shave is next. I think I'm going to like it a lot based on two half shaves with it. I found it smooth, comfortable and efficient as well.I had been shaving the last few weeks almost exclusively with the .95OC before I got my .72OC. I had one shave with the GC .84SB before the .72OC. The GC felt clunky compared to the .95OC. But when I used the .72OC, I was blown away. It's as smooth as the .95OC but way way way more forgiving, and even more forgiving than the GC. And as most GC.84SB users know, the GC is an easy razor to use. I think the GC shaves best at a steepish angle but with the LupoOC I tend to ride the smoothness ... if that makes sense. I haven't mentioned the efficiency. The .72OC is definitely more efficient than the GC. And while not as efficient as the .95SB/OC, and as @GlazedBoker intimates, it's more efficient than the shaver realizes--and yet with a very forgiving demeanor. The .72OC efficiency is knocking on the door of the .95.
What handle is that?View attachment 1573438
Lupo .72 SB. A solid shaver, but I tend to prefer the .95SB head... but perhaps the .72 just has to be used more frequently.
Considering the hype of the Green Cult, I understand your desire to take the detour. I'll be reading your reports when you get to them. I'll be most interested in the .72SB comparison as you get even more shaves in with both, since I've never used it.I am going to get a couple more shaves in with my new Green Cult 2.0 before I return to my Lupo testing. The 72OC for a complete shave is next. I think I'm going to like it a lot based on two half shaves with it. I found it smooth, comfortable and efficient as well.
For the RR GC .84 I use a Kai SS extra wide blade and it gives a real close shave that is very similar to the 2nd Generation Lupo .72 and .95 SB, the Lupo's give a excellent shave with almost any regular blade is my conclusion just using the Lupo.72 . Interesting results & reviews with the Lupo open comb base plates you folks have been using recently. The open comb razors will give excellent access to lather to the blade edge for maximum protection and comfort when steep angle shaving(riding the bar) IMO.I had been shaving the last few weeks almost exclusively with the .95OC before I got my .72OC. I had one shave with the GC .84SB before the .72OC. The GC felt clunky compared to the .95OC. But when I used the .72OC, I was blown away. It's as smooth as the .95OC but way way way more forgiving, and even more forgiving than the GC. And as most GC.84SB users know, the GC is an easy razor to use. I think the GC shaves best at a steepish angle but with the LupoOC I tend to ride the smoothness ... if that makes sense. I haven't mentioned the efficiency. The .72OC is definitely more efficient than the GC. And while not as efficient as the .95SB/OC, and as @GlazedBoker intimates, it's more efficient than the shaver realizes--and yet with a very forgiving demeanor. The .72OC efficiency is knocking on the door of the .95.
I don't think I'm using a steep angle when I ride the smoothness. I think it may be closer to neutral. But it seems to be quite effective. Though I'll keep experimenting as I go forward.For the RR GC .84 I use a Kai SS extra wide blade and it gives a real close shave that is very similar to the 2nd Generation Lupo .72 and .95 SB, the Lupo's give a excellent shave with almost any regular blade is my conclusion just using the Lupo.72 . Interesting results & reviews with the Lupo open comb base plates you folks have been using recently. The open comb razors will give excellent access to lather to the blade edge for maximum protection and comfort when steep angle shaving(riding the bar) IMO.
I'd love to unveil this Christmas gift... ThanksPerhaps Christmas morning. Stay tuned amigo….
Thank you for sharing your experience.I had been shaving the last few weeks almost exclusively with the .95OC before I got my .72OC. I had one shave with the GC .84SB before the .72OC. The GC felt clunky compared to the .95OC. But when I used the .72OC, I was blown away. It's as smooth as the .95OC but way way way more forgiving, and even more forgiving than the GC. And as most GC.84SB users know, the GC is an easy razor to use. I think the GC shaves best at a steepish angle but with the LupoOC I tend to ride the smoothness ... if that makes sense. I haven't mentioned the efficiency. The .72OC is definitely more efficient than the GC. And while not as efficient as the .95SB/OC, and as @GlazedBoker intimates, it's more efficient than the shaver realizes--and yet with a very forgiving demeanor. The .72OC efficiency is knocking on the door of the .95.
It's the Austin SS handle made my Stirling Soap Company.What handle is that?
it's too bad they don't sell that handle by itself. It looks lovely.I'd love to unveil this Christmas gift... Thanks
Thank you for sharing your experience.
Very interesting, if not tempting...
It's the Austin SS handle made my Stirling Soap Company.
A lovely combo with those Lupos.
Cheers!
I just checked and I found they have very good looking handles. I love the Dallas as well. I wonder how their heads work.I'd love to unveil this Christmas gift... Thanks
Thank you for sharing your experience.
Very interesting, if not tempting...
It's the Austin SS handle made my Stirling Soap Company.
A lovely combo with those Lupos.
Cheers!
I'm not seeking to derail the thread, but since you asked... Both Stirling heads offer plenty of blade feel, even the Standard SB plate offers more so than the Lupo .95 SB.I wonder how their heads work.
I looked them again yesterday... Only the aggressive head is available but it is almost tempting to buy one and add a handle... both the Austin and Dallas look nice so I'd end up with two nice handles for $45 each... a bit pricey but not overwhelming. I did email them and ask if I could buy handles separately but I never heard back. I guess I could try again.I'm not seeking to derail the thread, but since you asked... Both Stirling heads offer plenty of blade feel, even the Standard SB plate offers more so than the Lupo .95 SB.
The hyper aggressive SB plate justifies its name, it's not for faint-
hearted ones...
The razor is already discontinued, btw.
Cheers!