It was known the Mab razor, a person could shave 5 men in 4 minutes 42secs.
Never said it need to be a good shave in 4I've been straight shaving for six years now and I can't imagine a 4 minute pass. My hair is thick and wiry, but however I can imagine a 4 minute blade-to-face time after a shower or face prep if someone's hair is thin enough. BBS? maybe...
I interpreted this statement indirectly. Trying to tell the newbie consumer that he will need to buy a high-quality blade (meaning expensive) without explaining why. Sort of a hidden comparison against some cheap manufactured blade that is difficult to sharpen, does not hold an edge, easy to rust, etc. so it will not be sharp enough to shave without irritation....
"A high-quality stainless steel blade is needed to decrease the likelihood of irritation." I haven't read that SS is less irritating than Carbon Steel. Any truth to that? I'm fairly new to SRs.
This. The straight razor is antithetical to planned obsolescence.I agree. This is not random. Rather, I think that Gillette is recognizing that the rise of Traditional Wet Shaving is having an effect on their bottom line. I suspect that they made the comparison to straight razors, as opposed to anything else, for a few reasons.
First, an attack on DE razors or even older cartridge systems is not ultimately in their best interest. Worldwide, Gillette still sells a lot of DE blades and razors and, as already pointed out, sells a Brazil-made DE blade in the US. Gillette could, without question, easily put a DE razor and blades in every store, if they chose to. In fact, such a move could be part of some "last resort" plan.
Second, I haven't looked at numbers, but I suspect that they are seeing an increased interest in SR shaving by young men. This is likely part of the same overall trend that has brought back technologies like vinyl records. It is also, as has also been stated, the ultimate destination on many people's wet shaving journey.
Lastly, if anything exemplifies the antithesis of Gillette's business model, it is the straight razor. Think about it- a lifetime of shaves for one upfront investment in a shave-ready razor and strop. Yes, there is some extra care and maintenance involved but no further major investment. *shudder* Their worst nightmare would probably be if someone brought out a modern version of the Rolls Razor.
Note how Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffet) sold Gillette (which included Duracell batteries at the time) to Procter & Gamble in 2005 (getting some PG stock as part of the transaction). Then later in 2014, Berkshire exchanged its shares in PG back to Procter in order to get Duracell in return. Effectively unloading Gillette onto PG.Gillette as a brand is about as popular as blood diamond miners are. Go and ask every adult male you encounter about shaving in general and I guarantee you will not find one happy and satisfied Gillette customer. They all either 'hate shaving' and shell out for Gillette's latest gizmo anyway or are using some budget dispoable or subscription service.
Very interesting ad. As several have said, in marketing nothing is by chance. I also agree that there is a resurgence to wet shaving in SE/DE/SR shaving, I and many others are a perfect example. I switched due to cost of a cartridge and wanting a better result and experience. I drank the kool-aid and I love it. With the trend of things of the past becoming popular again Gillette maybe trying to get ahead of the curve of loosing revenue. There are many grooming shops (barbers etc) that are using a DE or SR in their regiment along with a nice hot lather. Hell the hot lather is a major selling point. Even higher end tattoo artists are embracing the trend and are using a DE razor to shave the clients instead of a disposable Bic or Gillette razor. This trend is growing with the younger population.
This reminds me of something that I've been pondering since reading the Gillette SR comparison. A key part of Gillette's marketing (and of the shaving industry as a whole) is that the absolute goal of shaving is the BBS shave. Moreover, having such a shave is directly linked to success in life and in love. Gillette ads going back to at least the era of the New present the image of a wife needing to buy her husband a New razor because he is unable to land a job because of a bad shave. Much later, Gem would feature an ad for the Featherweight where Mickey Mantle strikes out with a woman because of 5 o'Clock shadow from a shave that wasn't close enough.If you look at ads from magazines in Google Books, marketing then would never work today. Telling this generation what is best is going to be tested and not just accepted.
This reminds me of something that I've been pondering since reading the Gillette SR comparison. A key part of Gillette's marketing (and of the shaving industry as a whole) is that the absolute goal of shaving is the BBS shave. Moreover, having such a shave is directly linked to success in life and in love. Gillette ads going back to at least the era of the New present the image of a wife needing to buy her husband a New razor because he is unable to land a job because of a bad shave. Much later, Gem would feature an ad for the Featherweight where Mickey Mantle strikes out with a woman because of 5 o'Clock shadow from a shave that wasn't close enough.
One of Gillette's points in the comparison was how their thin, sharp, closely-spaced blades easily allowed for a close shave while the SR would require additional care and effort. In other words, 100 years of shaving innovation distilled down to a razor which will let a man achieve that Holy Grail of a BBS by doing little more than smacking himself with the razor.
The odd thing is that this goal of being clean shaven has been thrown by the wayside in recent years. Now, we see men actively cultivating stubble and routinely sporting mustaches and beards, often in styles last seen previously in silent movies. Even women seem to be starting to dump the idea of shaved armpits and legs which were pushed on them in the early 20th Century.
It starting to sound like the argument of an unsustainable company trying to justify its existence.
I watched the gizmodo video - never heard of this new shaving device. Looks like Gillette is fresh out of ideas. I believe I'll pass on it.I wouldn't go so far as buggy whip territory, but I do agree with your thinking. That they realize adding more blades is a dead end, and back tracking from that marketing message and innovation path will be difficult while protecting profit margins.
https://gizmodo.com/gillettes-latest-innovation-is-removing-blades-from-raz-1830288715
I have been expecting Unilever to start competing for grooming shelf space after they bought Dollar Shave Club, or for another company such as Church and Dwight to enter. Even though Gillette commands the lion share of store shelf space they must realize big trouble lies ahead. Most people switching to DE or twin blades are not ever going back to Fusion.