I thought for sure this would easily top $200:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290426251580&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290426251580&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Did The Misspelling Keep This Under The Radar?
- Thread starter tallow_first
- Start date
I saw that--a very nice piece.
garyg
B&B membership has its percs
I noticed it also - I have one already, sans the shipper .. looks like at least 10 souls saw it as well .. seems reasonable but until it is in hand who knows?
I saw it and would have been happy to pay that price for it but the seller would not post internationally.
How many of us search with intentional misspellings? 1, 2, 3 . . . . .I don't think this went under the radar. I mean come on, ow many razor hounds are on this board alone?.......
How many of us search with intentional misspellings? 1, 2, 3 . . . . .
It's spelled correctly in the description. I would hope most of us search both the tittle and the description.
Ebay misspellings are wonderful. Urban legend has it that some people mine them for a living. Here in France, I have picked up some real bargains by searching for "Gilette" on various sites. Reason is: a French person knows how to pronounce our favorite brand but, if he spelled it correctly, it would come out pronounced " zhee - ette". So they typically spell it wrong, with a single "l".
I looked on eBay but found no "search by tittle" option.
How many of us search with intentional misspellings? 1, 2, 3 . . . . .
I always search with mispellings...You'd be surprised how many times it happens. Some of the best deals have been found that way.
I saw it and would have been happy to pay that price for it but the seller would not post internationally.
It's a PIA...
How many of us search with intentional misspellings? 1, 2, 3 . . . . .
I do. Sometimes they go under, but there is often another key word or two that get them noticed. But I've not been searching much lately.... (started buying guitars again, far less razor money
).
I found it by searching the misspell. They got Executive right, however. I wonder how it would've done without Executive in the title.
