What's new

When is a Spirit too old to drink?

Was reading an interesting blurb on Slate today about how long is too long for a spirit to age before you drink it (Below is an excerpt from the article). Pretty interesting article which got me thinking about whisky in terms of value vs. age.

What in your opinion the perfect age for drinking a good scotch or whisky? This is just for spirits, wine obviously is a whole other animal.

"When it comes to barrel-aged spirits like whiskey and brandy, Dave Pickerell (former master distiller for Maker’s Mark) points to two key variables: the history of the barrel and the climate it’s stored in. Bourbon, for example, is aged in brand-new barrels in relatively dry conditions. By comparison, scotch is aged in previously used barrels in a relatively humid climate.


What distinguishes these two approaches is what Pickerell refers to as “the tea-bag effect”: The first time a tea bag (or barrel) is used, there’s more flavor to draw out. Resting in brand-new barrels, bourbon needs less time to extract what Pickerell calls “wood goodies”—it sucks vanilla and caramel flavors, as well as spice-like notes, out of the wood with ease. Many of those same bourbon barrels, once emptied, make their way to Scotland, where they are used to age Scotch whisky. At this point, most of the “wood goodies” have been depleted, so scotch often needs a longer aging time to suck out the remainders. Evaporation plays a role, too: In the dry climate favored by bourbon distillers, liquid evaporates more quickly, and the product becomes concentrated more quickly.



Pickerell puts the ideal aging range for rye (whiskey made with rye as its primary component, as opposed to corn or other grains) between nine and 11 years, while the “sweet spot” for bourbon (made with corn as its primary ingredient) is anywhere from six to 10 years. And scotch? “While it depends on the type and style,” he says, “20 years is a good number.”



But these aren’t necessarily hard and fast rules; there are plenty of delectable two-decade-old bourbons out there. Pickerell has had his share of favorites, too. “Pappy Van Winkle 20-year-old is a very tasty bourbon, not too tanniny,” he says. (Tannins—another byproduct of contact with oak—create that dry, unpleasantly puckery sensation in the mouth.) “But the 23-year-old is very tanniny.”



http://www.slate.com/articles/life/drink/2013/03/superaged_spirits_how_old_is_too_old_for_whiskey_gin_and_chartreuse.single.html
 
Last edited:
I assume the reference is 'at what point of aging does a spirit reach its peak?'

I've generally argued for around 18YO in whisky (Scotch), so it's nice to see that he agrees ('around 20YO'). I don't have enough experience of Whiskey to comment on that one....
 
I assume the reference is 'at what point of aging does a spirit reach its peak?'

I've generally argued for around 18YO in whisky (Scotch), so it's nice to see that he agrees ('around 20YO'). I don't have enough experience of Whiskey to comment on that one....

I'll echo that: I've been told 16 to 20 years is the best that most whisky will ever be. From personal experience, I'd say 17 years is the sweet spot.

On the other hand, I've had some truely magnificent 25 year olds, but they are genuinely rare things when you consider the amount of spirit made.
 
I'd say 17 years is the sweet spot.

FWIW, there rarely is such a thing.... Most '17' year olds are actually the 18YO variant, bottled under a number that doesn't include the '8' considered extremely unlucky in some markets.

There you go. Useless fact of the day.
 
Top Bottom