What's new

What are some negative exposure DE razors (for a nick-free shave)?

Let's not get hung-up on "negative blade exposure." What you're seeking, I understand, is a mild but effective razor that won't nick you. Who cares what the blade exposure is as long as your goal is achieved?
Thanks. I guess not having tried these razors I'm looking for some sort of signpost as to what make them mild but effective and not nicking.
 
My ATT Windsor SSR1 was extremely mild, but I got a CM1 plate for it. It is mildness of the sort one gets from a Feather (extreme mildness), yet it is an extremely efficient razor. It is not remotely persnickety about blade angle the way a Feather can be. I recommend it quite highly.

So you're saying the CM1 base is more efficient than the SSR1 plate, yet milder?
 

Tirvine

ancient grey sweatophile
So you're saying the CM1 base is more efficient than the SSR1 plate, yet milder?
Not more efficient but equally so, yet a tad milder. That is not to say that the SSR1 is not pretty darned mild and smooth. I honestly think most people could be thrilled as to comfort, efficiency, and closeness using any ATT Windsor. Unlike the Feather AS-D2 which really benefits from a very sharp blade, especially a Feather, the ATT is pretty fine with most any blade.
 
Not more efficient but equally so, yet a tad milder. That is not to say that the SSR1 is not pretty darned mild and smooth. I honestly think most people could be thrilled as to comfort, efficiency, and closeness using any ATT Windsor. Unlike the Feather AS-D2 which really benefits from a very sharp blade, especially a Feather, the ATT is pretty fine with most any blade.

Interesting. Is the CM1 different than the SSM1 as far as efficiency? I only ask as I might want to pick up the CM1 base before they are all sold out. I have the SSR1 now and like it....smooth and efficient. I don't really want to move backwards on efficiency, but the dual metal looks cool...might want to give it a try.
 

Tirvine

ancient grey sweatophile
Interesting. Is the CM1 different than the SSM1 as far as efficiency? I only ask as I might want to pick up the CM1 base before they are all sold out. I have the SSR1 now and like it....smooth and efficient. I don't really want to move backwards on efficiency, but the dual metal looks cool...might want to give it a try.
Pretty darned even on efficiency on my old man whiskers with three passes.
 
I'd venture rhe Wilkinson Sword Classic (polymer version) is very neutral in exposure.

If you mean the "Sticky"

1621275423558.png


Then I definitely agree! It's by far the mildest razor I own.
 
It's plastic, 2 piece very sturdy and very well made with a weighted handle. It comes with top notch blades for a very affordable price. Perfect to start the DE journey.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210517-214116_Amazon Shopping.jpg
    Screenshot_20210517-214116_Amazon Shopping.jpg
    440.8 KB · Views: 16
Interesting question. Having never actually measured blade exposure, here's my take on razors that feel like they have very little exposure to me. These all shave very close even though I hardly ever feel the blade against my skin.

Merkur Futur - turn it down to around 2.5 and it feels like the blade exposure is very low but the blade gap is huge so it's still very efficient.

Merkur Progress/Parker Variant - similar to the Futur but with a little less blade gap, these are very mild when turned down to around 2.5.

Rex Ambassador - I have to turn it down to 2 or less before it feels like the blade exposure is neutral or negative.


Here are some that people have mentioned as having negative blade exposure but I still feel the blade.

Feather ASD2 - I definitely feel blade with this one. Very much like a Tech, I usually can't get a BBS shave with it but I don't feel it's as mild as people say.

Wilkinson Sword Classic (the plastic one) - Shaves very similar to the Feather. Not a close shaver but I always feel the blade with it.

Gillette adjustable turned down low - There's a old sales brochure/chart out there from Gillette somewhere that shows the blade exposure of the adjustable at each setting. It was still positive even at 1. Shaving with one seems to bear that out for me. I doubt I could get a BBS shave on 1 but I still feel the blade.

My theory on all this is that blade exposure is the thing that makes a razor feel aggressive and blade gap is really important in making a razor effective. Most razors I've used have too much exposure combined with too little gap. That's just based on my whiskers and skin though. Gillette did a ton of research on this I'm sure, and found what they built works best for most people. I'm ok with not being in the fat part of the bell curve. It just makes it harder to find the perfect razor for me. If you're looking for a razor that has low exposure and is still effective, you'd probably enjoy one of the Merkur adjustables (or the Parker since it's mostly a Progress copy).
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom