- Thread starter
- #41
I have a small collection of Gillette Tech razors. To be honest the differences between them are quite small. The new Gillette Super Blue from China shaves almost the same as the English Flat Bottom or the prewar triangle hole or the 60's post-war. They're all really good.
Some folks say that there are differences. Others don't. Count me in the group that detects differences. Between Canada and USA Pre-War. Between early model and late model Techs. And more.Placebo effect I suspect. I have a USA prewar and a bunch of other Techs. TBH the differences are small. I've got to the point where I wouldn't spend any more money on Techs. They're just small variations on the same razor. Fantastic razors, all of them, though. Gillette had 80 years to perfect the design.
One example you can see: Look at the differences in the plates from the earliest Techs to the latest Techs. They definitely changed over time and flattened out. Personally, I prefer the feel and the results from the early Techs.
Nice thing about Techs is that almost all of them are quite reasonably priced. If folks want to evaluate the differences, it's easy enough to round up a Pre-War Tech and a late model Tech and test them.
Each shaver has to answer the question individually.