Tell me this isnt a double ring...

[DanInFla]

was watching this on ebay yesterday, and went back and forth a lot. i probably stared at this picture for 10 minutes. i am about 80% sure this is not a double ring, but wanted to run this by everyone to make me feel better.

my double ring head has 14 teeth, this one has 13 on each side. also, the side of the head doesnt quite look right. the handle does look dead on.

any thoughts?

 

[merwtje]

No, doesn't look like a Gillettte to me.
On the other hand it could have a double ring

 

[amishmotorboat]

Saw that one too. Head is all wrong for an old type because of the wider end teeth, and handle doesn't look right either.

edit: to clarify, the spacing between the 'rings' doesn't look right, and it looks too narrow, and that narrow part right below the bottom ring is just wrong.

 

[DanInFla]

Saw that one too. Head is all wrong for an old type because of the wider end teeth, and handle doesn't look right either.

edit: to clarify, the spacing between the 'rings' doesn't look right, and it looks too narrow, and that narrow part right below the bottom ring is just wrong.

my thoughts as well, at least i can sleep now

just saw the seller put this back up, apparently the buyer didnt pay, hope he wasnt a B&B who read this

 

[amishmotorboat]

Really? I don't see it.
Seems too early to relist for a non-paying bidder.

 

[thirdeye]

Hard to tell by this photo but it looks like one of many knock-offs of the original Gillette.

 

[DanInFla]

Really? I don't see it.
Seems too early to relist for a non-paying bidder.

he said the buyer contacted him last night and said he couldnt come up with the money...buyers remorse? haha