No, not the .30-06 vs .308 question. This concerns something seen earlier this week, that some sort of official investigation determined the M14 to be an inferior rifle to the M1. Sorry, don't have the URL to evaluate the source. Was wondering what in the world that was all about, especially since Garand was behind both the M14 and M1, and the M14 made it through US military trials prior to its adoption. Knew that the M14 had fully automatic fire (and was uncontrollable on that setting), but thought the magazine vs stripper clips, and lack of "M1 Thumb" would have been seen as a plus.
Anyone heard of this before, or was someone blowing smoke?
Anyone heard of this before, or was someone blowing smoke?