So my package gets here from Shoebox shave with my boars, a few other items and a couple nice gifts (including a hotel bar of speick... almost ordered one of these to be honest, just to remind myself what it smells like to decide if I want to replace the shave stick when it's gone).
I took the four of them to the sink and did 2 runs each through my bowl of mystery via Marco's Italian barber method to give them a good washing.
Immediate thoughts:
Bambino vs Little Runt: Knots are supposed to be virtually identical. The Bambino arrived MUCH more broken in and softer. The Little runt hair is a bit stiffer to start with. This likely varies brush to brush. The Bambino was initially mistaken for the mighty midget and I wasn't sure what the midget was. Without thinking to check to Invoice, I forgot what I had ordered and assumed it was one of Omega's "normal" sized brushes I had picked up and forgotten about.
The Little runt didn't shed at all. The bambino and Midget both shed quite a bit the first wash, but didn't shed the second. This was a concern for me since my Badger/boar Midget (which I've had a couple weeks now) has shed most of the first dozen or so uses it's gotten. It seems to be finally settling down though.
Both the little runt and bambino are very small knots, and I almost suspect after breakin I'll be wishing they were 3-4mm shorter. They work fine now, but the diameter/loft ratio is a bit of a worry seeing them in person. I'll update as they break in. The Little runt handle is surprisingly comfortable, so I hope it remains a good brush as It'd be a nice one to use.
The Midget on the other hand is already showing promise. It's similar to my Semogue 1933 (A very similar brush to a Semogue 1470, but with a bit more backbone) in size. It's 23/51mm vs 21/49 and a bit more bulb shaped. It seems a bit less dense and the hair seems a tad softer overall. The main difference is that while the 1933 is STILL breaking in after owning it for a year, the Midget was virtually broken in when I got it. I'll shave with it tomorrow and see how it feels on the face, but it definitely is looking like a keeper. My one complaint is the accordion thing going on with the handle. It's unnecessary for grip, the simpler design on my Mixed Mighty Midget works just as well, and since the handle is so fat for the size of the brush, I grip it tightly and it's a bit uncomfortable. I'd prefer if they had just scaled up the Mixed versions handle or even the Bambino's handle and put it in those.
Then there's the Edwin Jagger. The most expensive brush here at $12.50, it's a mixed bag. There are a lot of details you don't see in a brush this price usually. A rather streamlined shape to the brush in a decent-looking faux tortoise and a sturdy box. Unfortunately the brush itself gives me the impression that this brush is a "cheap" option from a Badger brush maker. While the Omega's and Semogue's are clearly made by companies that know boar brushes are their bread and butter, this brush seems like it's made with the idea in mind that the brush itself is a compromise. I could feel the ends of the hair while palm lathering, which tells me it's trimmed to shape, and it's quite a bit less dense than the Omega Midget. And with a 20/53mm knot/loft, that lack of density is likely going to matter. I'm going to keep it awhile and see if the trimmed ends break in. Assuming they do, it won't be a bad little brush, but I'd have a hard time recommending it over the Midget which is already clearly a superior brush at half the cost.
Left to right: Mixed hair MM, Boar MM, Bambino, Lil Runt Bambino, 11-p-3x, Semogue 1933
I took the four of them to the sink and did 2 runs each through my bowl of mystery via Marco's Italian barber method to give them a good washing.
Immediate thoughts:
Bambino vs Little Runt: Knots are supposed to be virtually identical. The Bambino arrived MUCH more broken in and softer. The Little runt hair is a bit stiffer to start with. This likely varies brush to brush. The Bambino was initially mistaken for the mighty midget and I wasn't sure what the midget was. Without thinking to check to Invoice, I forgot what I had ordered and assumed it was one of Omega's "normal" sized brushes I had picked up and forgotten about.
The Little runt didn't shed at all. The bambino and Midget both shed quite a bit the first wash, but didn't shed the second. This was a concern for me since my Badger/boar Midget (which I've had a couple weeks now) has shed most of the first dozen or so uses it's gotten. It seems to be finally settling down though.
Both the little runt and bambino are very small knots, and I almost suspect after breakin I'll be wishing they were 3-4mm shorter. They work fine now, but the diameter/loft ratio is a bit of a worry seeing them in person. I'll update as they break in. The Little runt handle is surprisingly comfortable, so I hope it remains a good brush as It'd be a nice one to use.
The Midget on the other hand is already showing promise. It's similar to my Semogue 1933 (A very similar brush to a Semogue 1470, but with a bit more backbone) in size. It's 23/51mm vs 21/49 and a bit more bulb shaped. It seems a bit less dense and the hair seems a tad softer overall. The main difference is that while the 1933 is STILL breaking in after owning it for a year, the Midget was virtually broken in when I got it. I'll shave with it tomorrow and see how it feels on the face, but it definitely is looking like a keeper. My one complaint is the accordion thing going on with the handle. It's unnecessary for grip, the simpler design on my Mixed Mighty Midget works just as well, and since the handle is so fat for the size of the brush, I grip it tightly and it's a bit uncomfortable. I'd prefer if they had just scaled up the Mixed versions handle or even the Bambino's handle and put it in those.
Then there's the Edwin Jagger. The most expensive brush here at $12.50, it's a mixed bag. There are a lot of details you don't see in a brush this price usually. A rather streamlined shape to the brush in a decent-looking faux tortoise and a sturdy box. Unfortunately the brush itself gives me the impression that this brush is a "cheap" option from a Badger brush maker. While the Omega's and Semogue's are clearly made by companies that know boar brushes are their bread and butter, this brush seems like it's made with the idea in mind that the brush itself is a compromise. I could feel the ends of the hair while palm lathering, which tells me it's trimmed to shape, and it's quite a bit less dense than the Omega Midget. And with a 20/53mm knot/loft, that lack of density is likely going to matter. I'm going to keep it awhile and see if the trimmed ends break in. Assuming they do, it won't be a bad little brush, but I'd have a hard time recommending it over the Midget which is already clearly a superior brush at half the cost.
Left to right: Mixed hair MM, Boar MM, Bambino, Lil Runt Bambino, 11-p-3x, Semogue 1933