Slash McCoy
I freehand dog rockets
Just give the teams a random number instead of a name. Or a number based on the charter date of school or franchise. Done.
Just give the teams a random number instead of a name. Or a number based on the charter date of school or franchise. Done.
You mean like the Philadelphia '76ers?
But too many team-fans already wave those big rubber fingers that say "Were #1" ... it will become massive confusion.
And what about the recent Super Series (or was it the World Bowl?) where Seattle faced off against Denver ...
what if both teams choose "420" as their designation?
Club was actually named in honour of a WW1 military unit that the original owner served in. The Regiment was nicknamed the Black Hawks, after the individual you are referring to, which is where the logo came from. It was not until recently that the Club went back to the original "one word" name for the team (Blackhawks, as opposed to Black Hawks).
So, to answer your question as to how it is "better", it eliminates what some may perceive as an offensive image and replaces it with one that still represents the club heritage, while incorporating a more modern take on the name. the image itself was rendered by an aboriginal artist here in Canada, which is why it has a bit of a "native art" feel to it.
Just give the teams a random number instead of a name. Or a number based on the charter date of school or franchise. Done.
I see a lot of comments about how people are easily offended these days, but shouldn't people whose race is being made a mockery of by a sports team have a legitimate right to be offended? There's a such thing as being easily offended, but then there are times when people should be rightfully offended. Would there be such indifference if there was a team called the Blackskins with a goofy caricature as it's logo?
Douglas Adams caused me to switch.Really?!? You always struck me as more of a 73s supporter . . . hunh.
Not that anyone has started a petition, but this design was created for a minor hockey "Blackhawks" team. I kind of like it.
That sums up my view on it too. Even if one might disagree with something, don't dismiss it out of hand as "PC crybabies looking for something to complain about" or whatever else. That's smug and elitist.You have to be able to look at any issue from the other guy's point of view. Can I see how people who have been dumped on by the United States for the entire history of the country might not consider their use as a cartoon mascot to be very respectful? Yeah, I can.
That sums up my view on it too. Even if one might disagree with something, don't dismiss it out of hand as "PC crybabies looking for something to complain about" or whatever else. That's smug and elitist.
Whether or not you view the naming of sports' teams after native tribes something worth creating controversy over, one should at least recognize that it is a valid complaint for a lot of people who don't view it as an "honor," but remember their history as an oppressed people, whose land was taken from them, whose ancestors were exterminated, and sent on trips hundreds of miles away from their homes because some white guys told them they had to move. Now, one could say "Well it's 2015 now, and all that was in the 1800's, and we're all Americans." But that's whitewashing and sweeping it under the rug.