It has not been used since the early 1960s. With the nylon bristles, it looks like it hasn't been used much at all, though I did find some soap residue on the handle. Before I found it, it had been stored in precisely three locations: the medicine cabinet; a shelf in his closet; and a repurposed shoe holder handing in his closet. Any gunk would be from storage, and when the house was fumigated in the early 1970s. Remembering the fumigation gave me a bit of a pause, but also remembered everything else was safe after a thorough washing. It has a tiny bit of discoloration on one side that I can't figure out, and might predate me. My father had went to foam, and when I accidentally broke his shaving mug, he wasn't upset at all.
I decided to wash it and put it into use. First was the anti-bacterial soap simply because it was handy. Washed the bristles with it, and lathered a few times with it in my hand. The discoloration remained, but the rest looked good. But it left the bristles with a tacky feel. So I decided to lather it up and rinse it.
The results was shocking. I did it exactly like my father taught me to lather, and it was like shoving a cylinder of plastic into the mug. Did not notice this when lathering with hand soap. It took a good deal of force to make the bristles give, and they didn't remain enough water. Had to add more water, and ended up with soupy lather. Well, wasn't going to shave with it, so I rinsed the brush as planned, and put it back up for now.
First thought: "Now I know why he went to foam." But you could get brushes locally then. I did in the 1970s. I have a synthetic, but it's a modern one, and doesn't behave like the Erskine.
Looked at it this morning. The bristles hardly look used at all, but that could be due to the nylon. But from the soap residue, I know that he did use it.
Don't know what to think about this brush. My guess is that synthetics have improved greatly since it was made. It was really a shocker.
I decided to wash it and put it into use. First was the anti-bacterial soap simply because it was handy. Washed the bristles with it, and lathered a few times with it in my hand. The discoloration remained, but the rest looked good. But it left the bristles with a tacky feel. So I decided to lather it up and rinse it.
The results was shocking. I did it exactly like my father taught me to lather, and it was like shoving a cylinder of plastic into the mug. Did not notice this when lathering with hand soap. It took a good deal of force to make the bristles give, and they didn't remain enough water. Had to add more water, and ended up with soupy lather. Well, wasn't going to shave with it, so I rinsed the brush as planned, and put it back up for now.
First thought: "Now I know why he went to foam." But you could get brushes locally then. I did in the 1970s. I have a synthetic, but it's a modern one, and doesn't behave like the Erskine.
Looked at it this morning. The bristles hardly look used at all, but that could be due to the nylon. But from the soap residue, I know that he did use it.
Don't know what to think about this brush. My guess is that synthetics have improved greatly since it was made. It was really a shocker.