a friend recently purchased a bottle of the balvenie 15 single barrel that we'll be enjoying this weekend. interestingly, he noted that according to the label it was put in cask in 1990 and bottled in 2008 effectively making it an 18 year. while i understand that longer aging does not necessarily make a whisky better, we can't help but feel that we got something of a bargain since it's an 18 year for the price of a 15!
i'm curious--is this practice of aging a whisky longer than advertised common with the balvenie or other distillers? it seems to make sense for the balvenie since their variations are aged in different types of wood the 15 aged in oak cannot simply be "held over" to make a portwood 21.
i'm curious--is this practice of aging a whisky longer than advertised common with the balvenie or other distillers? it seems to make sense for the balvenie since their variations are aged in different types of wood the 15 aged in oak cannot simply be "held over" to make a portwood 21.