- Thread starter
- #181
I agree with the rest of the guys. It’s from the box. Like Ian said they get listed all the time as Coticules because the sellers think they’re two layered.
Yeah, Washita's aren't to the price point where that stuff makes sense yet (so I say... but someone was counterfeiting Yellow Lake labels a decade ago... and that's a $50 stone on a good day).
Looks like a nice stone man, enjoy it. You have a convex soft ark as well as the hard ark right? I'm curious how you feel you do speed-wise on a flat Washita vs the convex soft.
The only two layered Washita are glued combos where they are glued to hard/soft arks, indias and maybe carborundums. No natural ones. Not saying a stone can't be different on one side vs the other, but it's still gonna be washita on both sides, and they were never deliberately cut to select two sides the way different color Thuri's were.
What's a good product for sealing a side label? I'm reattaching the Possible RR side label and want to protect it.
Well, I'm really worried about the label. Nothing you put on the front is going to seal it from behind. If SG migrates through the stones porosity, it will lift the label for sure. It doesn't really look that bad. If it were my stone sporting that label, I'd start by gently cleaning the label, seal it, and then move on to spot cleaning. In situations like this I've had excellent results by using WD 40 and a small, fine, carborundum pocket hones to scrub it a little. WD 40 will lift things out you won't believe and the stone breaks up the hardened gunk.
Good points. Well made. I had thought of the SG migration. How porous is the Washita? How deep is the oil?
My thinking on this is the that the WD 40 will loosen or thin any oil and funk on the stone. WD 40 is easier to remove than the congealed gunk at may get you where you want to go. I'm talking spray on a spot, rub and dab. I've also used electrical contract cleaner to get gunk out of a stone I didn't want to soak. At this point spot cleaning with Simple Green may be enough. Start gentle and add more aggressive means as needed. Yes the porosity will actually wick Simple Green higher than the soak line. There was a thread on here a couple weeks ago where some one had a labeled Washita and wanted to clean it. I wonder how that one turned out...
Say you soak the stone on it's back edge to protect the label. You will still have a dirt line where the Simple Green ended and the front will still be dirty. To really make it look real nice it will need to be submerged and soaked. Label will not survive that. It was discussed in the other post about removing the label and re-applying it. Hope this helps.
I bid/gamble on Ebay quite a bit due to HAD and Arkaholism. I've scored some really skanky, bar of tar looking hones, over the years, that had "tells" that there was something wonderful underneath it all. Some of my favorites started out nearly untouchable. I mean scrape with a putty knife, soak, scrape some more nasty. Some were submerged for weeks with changes of Simple Green about once a week. I buy Simple Green and WD 40 by the gallon.
Jim's stone should clean up nicely enough with spot cleaning like you mentioned. When he said Simple Green I took for granted he was going to soak it because that what normally end up doing. I've tried SG for spot cleaning and it didn't work as well as WD 40 and fine carbo. What I didn't try was SG and the carbo.