I don't have a Telstar but given other comparisons it is guaranteed to be more if not much more aggressive.Is this cartridge Yai Halequin much more aggressive even than the Yaqi Telstar?
I don't have a Telstar but given other comparisons it is guaranteed to be more if not much more aggressive.Is this cartridge Yai Halequin much more aggressive even than the Yaqi Telstar?
No problem, i think this post / conversation can help others in the same situation, lastly i didn't got the Tile head so i'm still interested to get another shave head. But after looking at the Yaqi sentinel post that is around here now i have my eyes on other Yaqi heads, but i still like the Tile because the top of the head is very flat, l have trouble shaving under my nose a lot but maybe that's because my technique is not good enough, i feel heads with big round tops make it harder. The Telstar will be my next zinc allow head acquisition.I am a bit late to the party. Voted Telstar since you said you want a steep angle shaver. But the Telstar is more aggressive than all the 3 past razors you mentioned in your first post. It has 1.15mm gap and some serious exposure. The moment you go to neutral or shallow angle you start getting unexpected cuts.
A bigger gap doesn't always mean more exposure. Imagine a 1.30 gap razor with negative exposure of -0.15. It will not be aggressive neither it will shave close. Actually it probaly won't shave close at all. On the other hand a razor with an exposure of +0.25 but a gap of 0.40 will not necessarily give you a close shave.I have a question for the more experienced shavers, a bigger gap always means more aggression? or blade exposure is a bigger factor. And correct me if i'm wrong, but a more aggressive shave head ≠ more efficiency. Those two factors are somewhat related but they not always go hand to hand.
I think i understood, thanks for the explanation.A bigger gap doesn't always mean more exposure. Imagine a 1.30 gap razor with negative exposure of -0.15. It will not be aggressive neither it will shave close. Actually it probaly won't shave close at all. On the other hand a razor with an exposure of +0.25 but a gap of 0.40 will not necessarily give you a close shave.
The closeness of shave of aggressiveness are not only defined by the gap and the exposure. There are at least 2 other important parameters of a head that are very often ignored. Degree of bending and clamping. The clamping actually can be divided into two or more factors. How strong is the clamping and what percentage of the blade is clamped strongly. I could even tell you there is one more thing related to the clamping - where the blade is clamped. Let's not forget the blade reaveal plays a certain role too (How much of the blade is uncovered by the cap when you look from above, not to be mistaken for exposure).
And finally I can recommend to you the Yaqi scalloped head that looks like DE89. It is more aggressive than DE89, but often you might need a bit of manual alignment. I like it so much that I bought more than 10 spares.
My guess is you didn't exactly catch my point. Gap and exposure are not the only factors. You forget about bending and clamping.Would you say that a bigger blade gap than .40 lets say something around .90 / 1 with positive blade exposure, lets say .25 to .5 would tend to be aggressive?
Those pictures are very confusing because they don't show a razor but a person. It is about the blade angle ralative to the skin. Shallow means you ride the cap. Steep means you ride the guard (the handle is almost parallel to the skin surface).Looking at this image, seems i been mixing what it means shallow and steep angles.
No, i complete understand what you explained the first time. Maybe i worded my question incorrectly.My guess is you didn't exactly catch my point. Gap and exposure are not the only factors. You forget about bending and clamping.
For instance the Greencult razor version 1.0 is something like the figures you mention - 0.95 gap with 0.25 exposure. Since it has a good degree of bending plus strong clamping on around 50% of the blade surface it is an aggressive razor.
Those pictures are very confusing because they don't show a razor but a person. It is about the blade angle ralative to the skin. Shallow means you ride the cap. Steep means you ride the guard (the handle is almost parallel to the skin surface).
Do you find the Hawk V2 aggressive?I see a few different cheaper SE heads from the various manufacturers and am trying to figure out which ones are best. I don’t want to just buy them all like I’ve done with DEs in the past but would love to have a couple good modern ones. The Romulus looks to be one of the best regarded cheaper options.
I also love my RazoRocks… all but my Hawk V2 that is. It’s the most aggressive razor I’ve felt and I think something has to be off since I read the opposite all the time. My daily is a GC .84p and the Lupo 95 is the upper limits of my comfort level at the moment but that Hawk is way more aggressive feeling the couple times I tried shaving with it. I’ll probably still try the V3 sometime.
Yes, the couple times I tried shaving with my V2 it felt extremely aggressive. The most aggressive razor I’ve felt out of about 30-40 and not usable for me.Do you find the Hawk V2 aggressive?
I have the Hawk V2 I don't find it very aggressive, I don't own the later V3 but I have Italian friends in the Telegram group on shaving assure me that in comparison the Hawk V2 is much gentler than its successor.
I think in deciding on a good razor IF you steer your choice towards the Chinese Yaqi or Dscosmetics you are not wrong.
I have the first production Yaqi SE Excalibur head and although it has flaws in the geometry it is still a very mild razor.
However I have not tried the later modifications buying Yaqi's new Romulus and Remus, however for what it costs you can try it and see if it shaves smooth and you like it.
That's right. You won't know. Also the majority of manufacturers will not specify gap and exposure. Add to that the factor that many manufacturers are changing their characteristics without any info at all. The major trend in recent years is to make a model milder by reducing gap and exposure. This has been done by many companies: Merkur, Pearl, Lord, Parker, Muhle.Let me try this time with this question. Coming from someone that probably does not have previous experiences with DE razor heads.
Unless you have the value of the 4 factors you mention, you can't know if a razor is aggressive / mild ? As far i have seen manufactures most of the time will only give you 1 or 2 properties.
Let me try this time with this question. Coming from someone that probably does not have previous experiences with DE razor heads.
Unless you have the value of the 4 factors you mention, you can't know if a razor is aggressive / mild ? As far i have seen manufactures most of the time will only give you 1 or 2 properties.
You won't know. And specs only tell one part of the story. Many razors shave much different than the specs would have you believe.
Have you used a DE before? If not, you could start with one of the razors often recommended here. Henson mild, Muhle DE89, Merkur 34c, more recent Gillette Tech, then go from there.
It's not a personal opinion. There is quite a lot of objectivity. A Tech is a Tech, a Roedter is a Roedter.Thank you a lot. This solidify my believe that "specs" mentioned by the manufactures are irrelevant, and that to say a DE razor is aggressive / mild etc is basically a personal opinion