Thank you very much for your wonderful post, dear @Mr Konrad Dundee !
Dear Friend, from what I have read from the Testers, no it does not seem to be more aggressiveThank you very much for your wonderful post, dear @Mr Konrad Dundee !
I just did a quick comparison of the Progress and Avanti blade gaps and it seems to me that the Avanti is more aggressive. Is that true?
Cheers!
I actually preferred an Oliworks razorAt $165.00 the Chinese forgot their products are to be price points items, not offer REAL DEAL ORIGINAL PRICING.
See no reason even to think about buying this.
Progress fans will get itAt $165.00 the Chinese forgot their products are to be price points items, not offer REAL DEAL ORIGINAL PRICING.
See no reason even to think about buying this.
Thank you very much, my dear friend!Dear Friend, from what I have read from the Testers, no it does not seem to be more aggressive
It just came out for sale to the public, I haven't tried one yet
I actually preferred an Oliworks razor
you lost me at "clone", but then I saw the price, close to 200eur, waitaminute. yes it is made of SS, not Zamak as the original. but for 200eur I'll wait for the reviews, as you can get 3 og progresses for this price.
They suck at making copy pasta.Here's the thing though. If you look at that page, in various places it says "stainless steel" everywhere but then when you look down at "Material" it says "Zinc alloy+brass+aluminum". So what is it?
This is a huge pet peeve of mine, manufacturers and vendors that seem to think that "stainless steel" is just a vanity name for a finish, like "azure seascape" or "goldenrod" paint colors.
Maybe it's actually stainless. It should be for the price. But then why list zinc, brass, and aluminum in the materials?