hi guys,
I have a lot of brushes (I sell new and vintage) and also collect vintage ones too.
what i've found it that the hair in my vintage ones always seems much softer than the new ones.
For example, I have a lovely USA Made-Rite (brush on right in image below) and although it is 'Pure Badger' it is softer than any of the new Best or Supers I have and certainly any new 'pure' (from Simpson's, Vulfix, Kent, Edwin Jagger etc). Even the little brush on the left - also pure is softer than any new one I have.
I suppose the softness could come from the fact that they've been used, but the made-rite looks pretty unused to me.
Anyone have similar experiences?
I have a lot of brushes (I sell new and vintage) and also collect vintage ones too.
what i've found it that the hair in my vintage ones always seems much softer than the new ones.
For example, I have a lovely USA Made-Rite (brush on right in image below) and although it is 'Pure Badger' it is softer than any of the new Best or Supers I have and certainly any new 'pure' (from Simpson's, Vulfix, Kent, Edwin Jagger etc). Even the little brush on the left - also pure is softer than any new one I have.
I suppose the softness could come from the fact that they've been used, but the made-rite looks pretty unused to me.
Anyone have similar experiences?
