Only have notes for today's tea due to emergency reboot...so the rest will have to be from memory.
Did thermos of the '20 XZH Taiji maocha and the '19 XZH Taiji. '19 was much darker and more herbal and less vegetal. Both had good thickness and lots of good quality qi. Also, I've been thinking about these teas more, and now I'm switching from the idea that they are elite Wuliang teas to being the proverbial unicorn of a good Laos tea (not the stuff directly across the border that gets sold as high end Yiwu). I believe that Yiwu is pretty well explored by now. There hasn't been a new place since Tianmenshan at around 2012, and other newish places are essentially super micro-areas of the Tongqinghe group, going from Baihuatang, and now Pythonqing, and this one other micro area I can't remember right now. Of course, all of these areas are at least $500/kg. Wuliang teas suffer from the fact that gushu areas are dotted accross the countryside with very small yields, as typical of most northern tea areas--thus the best areas aren't much cheaper than the very best teas further south, like Mojiang county Phoenix' Nest. Laos, on the other hand, is relatively underexplored, so there's always been a chance that a non-GFZ/WGZ area Laos tea would show up that's actually great. Laos tea and Wuliang tea does have some overlap in nature, and Taiji does do stuff similar to both. And in this way, what is clearly Sanhetang's best tea of the very recent years could be cheaper than their named stuff like the '19 Tianmenshan, etc, etc.
The shu of Friday was Loyal Soldier from White2Tea. I liked this session more than I did the first session. One key thing that is true from the blurb is that the soup viscosity is indeed thick and sticky. The character of the aroma and taste is a little unsteady, early brews can have a very nice caramel aspect that fades away and leaves one wanting more. Main regular taste is root herbal, herbal, fermentation depth, gets minerally in late brews like Sunday Special. Not too aggressive about aftertaste, and there is some qi.
The sheng of Saturday was the 2011 XZH Lao Wu Shan, going down the list of XZH Lao Wu Shans. This tea wasn't overstored, unlike the 2010. Can't really remember what the aroma was like, early brews had a bit of that fruit candy sweetness, but it move to a more dark herbal, woody scent. The taste was dark herbal, somewhat similar to a XZH '07 Shangpin from Kuzhushan, but it had a somewhat sweet nannuo carrot nature in that depth. The viscosity was decent and smooth. There was some good cooling, including cooling of the lips. Main aftertaste was a bit of yiwu huigan and some mouthcoat that has the cooling associated with it, and which lingers. The qi was moderate to strong of very nice quality. Not particularly durable.
Compared to the 2010, this 2011 is better stored, is richer and more robust in aroma and taste. It's weaker in terms of nuances in taste and complexity of aftertastes.
The sheng of today, which I have notes for, is some maocha of 2020 XZH Tianmenshan. It is about $1.20 a gram for 50g in a canister, like the 2020 Taiji that is only 51 cents a gram. It is fairly inferior to the Taiji, which has its own problem in being a bit open and vegetal. The TMS is dense and dark in contrast. This TMS maocha can't be the material on the level of the previous cakes of TMS that XZH has done.
The aroma was unusually weak and didn't last that long into the session. It varied a bit, but I think the center of gravity was herbal and mineral, while also having honey, vegetalness, fruit, barnyard, cola as potential elements. The taste while the tea was really going was choco, some bitter tcm, mineral, a touch of cola. This tea isn't very layered in taste and becomes simple pretty quickly. In later long brews, it had a pleasant and consistent light mineral and honey character. The mouthfeel is good, very thick with a pudding texture, doesn't have much astringency. As with the Lao Wu Shan, there is a lot of cooling, and particularly associated with the mouthcoat. There was also a bit of yiwu huigan. The qi was pretty good and somewhat positive tilt. Durability was pretty poor, though. Gotta wonder if it's fall tea.
Did thermos of the '20 XZH Taiji maocha and the '19 XZH Taiji. '19 was much darker and more herbal and less vegetal. Both had good thickness and lots of good quality qi. Also, I've been thinking about these teas more, and now I'm switching from the idea that they are elite Wuliang teas to being the proverbial unicorn of a good Laos tea (not the stuff directly across the border that gets sold as high end Yiwu). I believe that Yiwu is pretty well explored by now. There hasn't been a new place since Tianmenshan at around 2012, and other newish places are essentially super micro-areas of the Tongqinghe group, going from Baihuatang, and now Pythonqing, and this one other micro area I can't remember right now. Of course, all of these areas are at least $500/kg. Wuliang teas suffer from the fact that gushu areas are dotted accross the countryside with very small yields, as typical of most northern tea areas--thus the best areas aren't much cheaper than the very best teas further south, like Mojiang county Phoenix' Nest. Laos, on the other hand, is relatively underexplored, so there's always been a chance that a non-GFZ/WGZ area Laos tea would show up that's actually great. Laos tea and Wuliang tea does have some overlap in nature, and Taiji does do stuff similar to both. And in this way, what is clearly Sanhetang's best tea of the very recent years could be cheaper than their named stuff like the '19 Tianmenshan, etc, etc.
The shu of Friday was Loyal Soldier from White2Tea. I liked this session more than I did the first session. One key thing that is true from the blurb is that the soup viscosity is indeed thick and sticky. The character of the aroma and taste is a little unsteady, early brews can have a very nice caramel aspect that fades away and leaves one wanting more. Main regular taste is root herbal, herbal, fermentation depth, gets minerally in late brews like Sunday Special. Not too aggressive about aftertaste, and there is some qi.
The sheng of Saturday was the 2011 XZH Lao Wu Shan, going down the list of XZH Lao Wu Shans. This tea wasn't overstored, unlike the 2010. Can't really remember what the aroma was like, early brews had a bit of that fruit candy sweetness, but it move to a more dark herbal, woody scent. The taste was dark herbal, somewhat similar to a XZH '07 Shangpin from Kuzhushan, but it had a somewhat sweet nannuo carrot nature in that depth. The viscosity was decent and smooth. There was some good cooling, including cooling of the lips. Main aftertaste was a bit of yiwu huigan and some mouthcoat that has the cooling associated with it, and which lingers. The qi was moderate to strong of very nice quality. Not particularly durable.
Compared to the 2010, this 2011 is better stored, is richer and more robust in aroma and taste. It's weaker in terms of nuances in taste and complexity of aftertastes.
The sheng of today, which I have notes for, is some maocha of 2020 XZH Tianmenshan. It is about $1.20 a gram for 50g in a canister, like the 2020 Taiji that is only 51 cents a gram. It is fairly inferior to the Taiji, which has its own problem in being a bit open and vegetal. The TMS is dense and dark in contrast. This TMS maocha can't be the material on the level of the previous cakes of TMS that XZH has done.
The aroma was unusually weak and didn't last that long into the session. It varied a bit, but I think the center of gravity was herbal and mineral, while also having honey, vegetalness, fruit, barnyard, cola as potential elements. The taste while the tea was really going was choco, some bitter tcm, mineral, a touch of cola. This tea isn't very layered in taste and becomes simple pretty quickly. In later long brews, it had a pleasant and consistent light mineral and honey character. The mouthfeel is good, very thick with a pudding texture, doesn't have much astringency. As with the Lao Wu Shan, there is a lot of cooling, and particularly associated with the mouthcoat. There was also a bit of yiwu huigan. The qi was pretty good and somewhat positive tilt. Durability was pretty poor, though. Gotta wonder if it's fall tea.