Semogue Vs Omega - How Different?

[Goblin]

Since I have fallen off the 2012 Shave Supplies Sabbatical wagon in style, I have been considering a cream order from a store that stocks Semogue brushes. When I started using brushes I couldn't find a supplier for Semogue in the UK, so my boar collection consists of 3 Omegas, all of which I enjoy (00049, 11137 and 13522 - a great little brush for the money).

My question is simply this - if I were to pick up a Semogue (currently a toss up between 620, 1305, 1800 or SOC) would I notice a significant improvement in performance over my Omegas? I am tempted, but I really only want to spend the money if the Semogue will seriously impress me. There is no way I can justify another boar on the basis of need, and I would have some explaining to do around the house!

Thanks for any insights!

 

[jhclare]

Hi, I don't frequent the shaving forums much any more - after trying nearly every product under the sun over the last couple of years, I have settled on one brush, one razor, one blade, and a couple of soaps!

During my boar-phase, I preferred Omega boars over Semogues. I found Semogues too longer to break in, weren't as dense, and were more prickly, in general, then the Omegas. I also found their short loft boars were too short for the hair type - boar hair needs to be around 55mm loft, in my opinion.

The 2009 Semogue LE two band was an exception - I regret selling that one. I haven't tried any of the Owners Club models that reportedly have the same hair. I would definitely check out one of those - it will beat the Omega 49 a bit in terms of density, feel and performance, and the handle is great.

John

 

[mftoms59]

MMMV from John's, I preferred the Semogue, specifically the 1250 which became very soft and retained good backbone, though not as stiff as the Omega IMO, after ~15-20 lathers.
I've also had the 610, same Hair Grade and Loft (55mm) as the 1250, with a shorter handle and the 2000 which is very large @60/26 and a fat 50mm handle, my overall favorite is the 1250. I'd also recommend the La Toja regular or Sensitive SC if you're browsing Vintage Scent.

 

[nav]

The cheaper Omega's are definitely better than the cheaper Semogues. The Omega's are more dense, softer tips and overall, better performers. I received an Omega mighty midget in a PIF and it is awesome! The cost of that brush is around $10. Compare this to the $12-15 Semogue's and the Omega comes out on top.
When you get into the upper range, the Semogue's kick butt.
I have come to settle on the 1800 which I find is the PERFECT balance of backbone and density and tip softness. The handle is also the most ergonomic I have ever used on any brush.
Even the Omega 31064 doesn't compete against the Semogue 1800.

BTW I got my 1800 from vintagescent.com
They are the best Semogue stockists around, a total pleasure to deal with!

 

[Henrik]

The cheaper Omega's are definitely better than the cheaper Semogues. The Omega's are more dense, softer tips and overall, better performers.

+1

 

[Marco]

With all due respect for Omega, a well known brand that makes very good boar brushes, Semogue is simply superior IMHO.